<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title>Sociology - Journal Articles</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/214" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/214</id>
<updated>2013-05-22T05:35:09Z</updated>
<dc:date>2013-05-22T05:35:09Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The gravity of Eros in the contemporary: an introduction</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/965" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Szakolczai, Árpád</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Horvath, Agnes</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/965</id>
<updated>2013-03-26T03:09:01Z</updated>
<published>2013-02-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The gravity of Eros in the contemporary: an introduction
Szakolczai, Árpád; Horvath, Agnes
The question of Eros, understood in the broader sense of passionate devotion, takes us&#13;
back to classical philosophical anthropology, the very foundations of social and&#13;
political analysis, and in particular the work of Plato, which argues that imitation and&#13;
not rationality is the moving force of social and political life. For Plato rationality, or&#13;
reliance on the powers of reason, is not an anthropological constant, rather a capacity&#13;
to be acquired and developed in order to resist the overwhelming powers of mimetic&#13;
processes, particularly strong in ‘in between’ situations (on metaxy, see Voegelin,&#13;
1978). Historically, an ignorance of the role of imitation in politics resulted in the&#13;
reduction of rationality to a tool in the instrumental furthering of imitative processes&#13;
in order to promote particular political agendas; the central problem with&#13;
contemporary media-driven politics. This special section argues that the imitative and&#13;
multiplicative aspects of modern politics can be understood through analyzing the&#13;
way in which subjugation to Eros, both in the narrow sense of ‘sexual’ pleasures&#13;
(Foucault, 1986) and the broader sense of blind, unconditional, passionate devotion, is&#13;
a main consequence of socially disruptive situations. Plato’s analysis of Eros as a&#13;
force that deprives one of one’s faculties of distinction and judgement, thus allowing&#13;
a potentially overwhelming capacity for imitative receptivity to take hold and to drive attempts to possess qualities and constitute identities, but that can at the same time&#13;
shake up, turn around and elevate, will be our main methodological guiding tool.&#13;
The overwhelming dominance of Eros in the contemporary world is well&#13;
known by everybody – at least as far as the signs and symptoms go. We live in a&#13;
world that has become totally penetrated and impregnated by Eros, in both private and&#13;
public. The conviction that sex is the ultimate goal of human life was given its&#13;
solemn, authoritative justification by the thinking of Freud. While the&#13;
problematisation of Freud is also part of the contemporary intellectual landscape (see&#13;
Dufresne, 2003; Esterson, 1993; Forrester, 1996; Webster, 2005),1 the damage was&#13;
done; and, apart from deconstructing Freud, one should also explore better ways of&#13;
thinking about the force of sexual love and passionate devotion.&#13;
The papers in this Special section suggest a return to Ancient Greece, and in&#13;
particular the thinking of Plato.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>In liminal tension towards giving birth: Eros, the educator</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/966" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Szakolczai, Árpád</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/966</id>
<updated>2013-04-08T08:33:26Z</updated>
<published>2013-02-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">In liminal tension towards giving birth: Eros, the educator
Szakolczai, Árpád
The discussion on the nature of Eros (love as sexual desire) in Plato’s Symposium&#13;
offers us special insights concerning the potential role played by love in social and&#13;
political life. While about Eros, the dialogue also claims to offer a true image of&#13;
Socrates, generating a complex puzzle. This article offers a solution to this puzzle by&#13;
reconstructing and interpreting Plato’s theatrical presentation his argument, making&#13;
use of the structure of the plays of Aristophanes, a protagonist of the Dialogue. The&#13;
new image of Socrates, it is argued, signals Plato’s move beyond the way he&#13;
envisioned so far his master, best visible in his introducing Diotima, a prophetess who&#13;
takes over the role of guide from Socrates; and by presenting the truth about Socrates&#13;
through Alcibiades, cast into the role of a boastful intruder, a central figure in&#13;
Aristophanes’ comedies. Eros and Socrates are both ‘in-between’ or liminal figures,&#13;
indicating that Socrates is still entrapped in the crisis of Athenian democracy. The&#13;
way out, according to the new philosophy of Plato, lies by redirecting Eros from the&#13;
hunting of beautiful objects to be possessed to elevating the soul to the essence of&#13;
beauty as a primary means for further generating beauty, in particular through engendering and educating children, thus reasserting a harmonious co-existence with&#13;
the order of the cosmos.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-02-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Thinking as testing the limits of friendship: on the Voegelin-Schütz correspondence</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/967" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Szakolczai, Árpád</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/967</id>
<updated>2013-03-26T03:09:07Z</updated>
<published>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Thinking as testing the limits of friendship: on the Voegelin-Schütz correspondence
Szakolczai, Árpád
The exchange of letters between Eric Voegelin and Alfred Schütz took place in between&#13;
1938, or the year in which both were forced to leave Vienna due to the annexation of&#13;
Austria by Nazi Germany, and 1959, when Schütz passed away. Several of the more&#13;
important letters were published previously in various contexts, and the project of&#13;
publishing them all goes back to the 1970s. The entire correspondence, in the original&#13;
German, only appeared in 2004. This book is a comprehensive selection and English&#13;
translation of that volume.&#13;
The book provides fascinating insights into the lives, times, works, and ideas of&#13;
two master thinkers – though mostly to those who are already reasonably familiar with&#13;
them. While the editors rightly state in their Introduction (the English version is a slightly&#13;
modified translation of the German text) that it was not the place for a comprehensive&#13;
reassessment of the work in light of this correspondence (p.5), more background details&#13;
for a volume like this would have been helpful. However, the size of the book, both in&#13;
English (261 pp.) and especially in German (579 pp.), might explain the limited space left&#13;
for the ‘Editor’s Introduction’ (5 pages of text, followed by 2 full pages of notes).&#13;
The most interesting part of the correspondence, without any doubt, are the&#13;
often quite long letters that touch upon the heart of the work of the two thinkers,&#13;
sparked by Voegelin’s first comments on reading Husserl’s Crisis. As both of them&#13;
considered the other a privileged interlocutor, the ideas expressed have particular&#13;
significance for the thinking of each. The exchange of letters is revealing not only&#13;
concerning the substance of their disagreement, but also the manner in which this was&#13;
addressed and handled. Here a central issue is played by the question of friendship.
</summary>
<dc:date>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Dance-work: Images of organization in Irish dance</title>
<link href="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/209" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kavanagh, Donncha</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Kuhling, Carmen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Keohane, Kieran</name>
</author>
<id>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/209</id>
<updated>2013-03-08T03:00:23Z</updated>
<published>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Dance-work: Images of organization in Irish dance
Kavanagh, Donncha; Kuhling, Carmen; Keohane, Kieran
The Irish economic boom, commonly known as the Celtic Tiger, provides an interesting and unique opportunity to explore the relationship between the profound shifts in the organization of working life and in the production and consumption of culture. In this paper, we confine our inquiry into the relationship with one aspect of popular culture, namely dance, focusing on the phenomenon of Riverdance which emerged contemporaneously with the Celtic Tiger. We argue that both are deeply immersed in larger organizing discourses, historical narratives about national identity and civilizing attempts to control the body. We identify three distinct 'moments' in the development of Irish dance, which we label as pre-national, 'Traditional' Ireland; national, 'Modern', Parochial Ireland and global, 'Post-modern' Ireland. This provides a narrative through which we explore the transformation of working relations in Ireland during the 19th and 20th centuries.
</summary>
<dc:date>2008-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
