Biased group decision-making and the effect of computer-mediated communication: separating the effects of anonymity, voting and blind picking

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
6-101_DESRIST.pdf(141.46 KB)
Published Version
Date
2015-05
Authors
Lamprecht, Jens
Robra-Bissantz, Susanne
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
DESRIST 2015
Published Version
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The influence of communication technology on group decision-making has been examined in many studies. But the findings are inconsistent. Some studies showed a positive effect on decision quality, other studies have shown that communication technology makes the decision even worse. One possible explanation for these different findings could be the use of different Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in these studies, with some GDSS better fitting to the given task than others and with different sets of functions. This paper outlines an approach with an information system solely designed to examine the effect of (1) anonymity, (2) voting and (3) blind picking on decision quality, discussion quality and perceived quality of information.
Description
Keywords
Hidden profile , Group decision making , Computer-mediated communication , Computer support , Information sharing , Design science , Anonymity , Voting , Blind pick , Social validation , Conformity pressure , Ownership bias
Citation
LAMPRECHT J. & ROBRA-BISSANTZ, S. 2015. Biased group decision-making and the effect of computer-mediated communication: separating the effects of anonymity, voting and blind picking. In: DONNELLAN, B., GLEASURE, R., HELFERT, M., KENNEALLY, J., ROTHENBERGER, M., CHIARINI TREMBLAY, M., VANDERMEER, D. & WINTER, R. (eds.) At the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May. pp. 41-46
Copyright
©2015, The Author(s).