Action design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design science

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMaccani, Giovanni
dc.contributor.authorDonnellan, Brian
dc.contributor.authorHelfert, Markus
dc.contributor.editorDonnellan, Brian
dc.contributor.editorGleasure, Rob
dc.contributor.editorHelfert, Markus
dc.contributor.editorKenneally, Jim
dc.contributor.editorRothenberger, Marcus
dc.contributor.editorChiarini Tremblay, Monica
dc.contributor.editorVanderMeer, Debra
dc.contributor.editorWinter, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-13T15:08:27Z
dc.date.available2015-05-13T15:08:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.description.abstractThis research in progress paper addresses the IS issue in relation to conducting relevant research while keeping academic rigor. In particular, it contributes to the ongoing academic conversation around the investigation on how to incor-porate action in design science research. In this document the philosophical underpinnings of the recently proposed methodology called Action Design Re-search [1] are derived, outlined and integrated into Burrel and Morgan’s Par-adigmatic Framework (1979)[6]. The results so far show how Action Design Research can be considered as a particular case of Design Science Research (rather than a methodology closely related to Action Research) although they can assume two different epistemological positions. From these philosophical perspectives, future works will involve the inclusion of actual research projects using the three different methodologies. The final goal is to outline and structure the divergences and similarities of Action Design Research with Design Science Research and Canonical Action Research.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMACCANI, G., DONNELLAN, B., HELFERT, M. 2015. Action design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design science. In: DONNELLAN, B., GLEASURE, R., HELFERT, M., KENNEALLY, J., ROTHENBERGER, M., CHIARINI TREMBLAY, M., VANDERMEER, D. & WINTER, R. (eds.) At the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May. pp. 69-76.en
dc.identifier.endpage76en
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-910097-80-9
dc.identifier.startpage69en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/1809
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDESRIST 2015en
dc.relation.ispartofAt the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May.
dc.relation.urihttp://desrist2015.computing.dcu.ie/
dc.rights©2015, The Author(s).en
dc.subjectAction design researchen
dc.subjectParadigmatic frameworken
dc.subjectDesign scienceen
dc.subjectCanonical action researchen
dc.titleAction design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design scienceen
dc.typeConference itemen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10-100_DESRIST2015_Action Design Research.pdf
Size:
125.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
At the Vanguard of Design Science: DESRIST 2015 Research-in-Progress Proceedings