Philosophy - Doctoral Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Meaning, Dasein and art: new paths to continuity in Heidegger's thought(University College Cork, 2024) Lan, Ying; Loughnane, Adam; China Scholarship CouncilThe question of meaning in Heidegger's thought has provoked debates on whether his project is fundamentally continuous, or if there might be a break, a “turn” or a discontinuity in his thinking. This study argues for continuity. This study argues that, in Heidegger's inquiry, this continuity thesis constitutes a path to the source of the question of the meaning of Being, the unfolding of the question itself, especially Heidegger's consistency in answering the question of the meaning of Being in the works exploring Dasein's essence, art and truth. Besides that, while dealing with this continuity-discontinuity debate, this study attempts to address some of the challenges and criticisms related to it to clarify Heidegger's claims better. Firstly, meaning theory originates from Heidegger's response to modern logic and method. Heidegger's theory of meaning is distinct from modern logic and phenomenology but closely related to them at the beginning of its formulation. The theory of meaning as a question of the meaning of Being originates in the differentiation between logic and reality. Heidegger attempts to develop a field to bridge the dichotomy, the pre-theoretical field of praxis. Secondly, Heidegger's unique interpretation of this question. The realization of this field of praxis first commences in the existential structure of human existence and continues as an origin of occurrence in the work of art. This interpretation is the cause of the dispute between continuity and discontinuity. The current interpretation takes a position of continuity because of the methodological choice to pursue the meaning of Being and because this question cannot be independent and separate in the interpretation of Dasein and in art, which jointly constitute Heidegger's claim at the very beginning. Based on an affirmation of the continuity of interpreting meaning, this thesis is committed to clarifying some of the misunderstandings or not-so-adequate readings of Heidegger and considering how Heidegger's theory of meaning might engage more productively with the more current issues of our time. Given the historical origin of theories of meaning, human practice cannot be pre-constructed but can only be an “adaptation” (Ereignis) as a meaningful way of Being. In other words, if we accept Heidegger's position, we cannot deliberately begin an artistic practice in order to acquire new intelligibility, but rather only have open to ourselves an adaptation to the context we have. More importantly, the adaptation is not a subjective creation or passive acceptance, but an active enactment of a given situation.Item Coordinating minds: mindshaping, communication and technology(University College Cork, 2023) Finnegan, Colum; Ross, DonTraditional explanations of social cognition and coordination are under revision. Accounts that emphasise mindreading, the dominant, internalist and spectatorial framework, are challenged by accounts based on mindshaping, an externalist, interactionist concept. Mindshaping places the interpersonal regulation of minds at the root of coordination, and self-generation. However, if the profiles of selves are socially sourced, as mindshaping accounts claim, then structures that interact with these processes call for close examination in light of the new insights. One such structure, that now plays a crucial role in facilitating mindshaping, is digital communication technology. Due to the historical dominance of mindreading accounts, online communication has been primarily conceptualised in individualistic terms. As a result, the content of information communicated online (e.g. fake news, conspiracy theories) is seen as the primary driver of problematic outcomes. However, the mindshaping-based framework reveals that many pernicious features of online discourse are instead caused by the form of online communication and the incentive structures it creates for agents seeking to coordinate action. Specifically, as currently designed, online communication interferes with and modifies the types, range and effectiveness of signals deployed by agents to signal coordination suitability, changing the equilibrium dynamics of quotidian interpersonal coordination. In this new domain, I argue that mindshaping processes like imitation and conformism push agents to strategically adopt increasingly extreme belief sets. This in turn creates significant coordination noise and generates a perception of ecological threat – thereby undermining general social welfare and contributing to political stasis. These outcomes are in part the result of particular interface design choices which are responsive to the economic incentive structure within which online communication providers emerged and operate. However, this incentive structure could be reformed, and mindshaping-based explanations can play a crucial role in guiding such reforms, delineating specific causal dynamics that underpin dysfunctional online communication. I draw together literature from coordination theory, mindshaping, cultural evolution, political economy and online knowledge dissemination to show how the current digital ecology shapes minds in problematic ways but could be re-engineered by regulators to shape minds less perniciously.Item The phenomenology of psychedelic experiences(University College Cork, 2023) Forde, Danny; Salice, Alessandro; Krueger, JoelOver the past couple of decades, empirical research into the clinical and therapeutic application of psychedelic drugs has shown great promise in treating a wide range of psychiatric conditions. While there is an ever-expanding literature concerning empirical questions about these drugs and the experiences which they engender, it is only in recent years that an in-depth philosophical analysis of the psychedelic experience has begun to flourish. The aim of this dissertation is to fill an important gap in this nascent philosophical literature by offering a thorough phenomenological analysis of psychedelic experiences under the specific conditions of psychedelic-assisted therapy. This entails taking into account the fundamental structure of conscious experience and seeing how the psychedelic experience modifies each individual aspect of this structure. I will argue that the basic structure of conscious experience is maintained during psychedelic experiences and that they provide the subject with a deeply felt sense of oneness with the cosmos (generally associated with the phenomenon of ‘ego-dissolution’) and the sense that this experience is as real, if not more real, than normal reality. My central claim is that these experiences feel real because they do in fact disclose mind-independent features of reality and offers the subject a direct apprehension of what the mystics call the Ground of Being. I call this position psychedelic realism. The dissertation defends a bundle of four interconnected claims. My first thesis is that a minimal sense of self is maintained even during the most turbulent experiences of ego-dissolution. This leads into my second thesis which argues that rather than being purely hallucinatory, the psychedelic experience can reveal aspects of reality which would not otherwise be disclosed, i.e., as the ego dissolves one gains a view of the world which I call ego-free seeing. My third thesis is that the psychedelic experience can open the subject to the essential nature of reality. Here I will claim that the mythopoetic archetypical phenomena encountered during the peak of the psychedelic experience are best comprehended in terms of essences. Lastly, I argue that the psychedelic experience is a bona fide transformative experience and offers a distinct way of apprehending the Ground of Being.Item Normative expectations and subjective beliefs: an incentivised experimental study(University College Cork, 2022-12-12) Wang, Cuizhu; Ross, Don; Harrison, Glenn; Georgia State University; University of Cape TownThis thesis is an experimental study to investigate the operationalisability of the theory of social norms provided by Cristina Bicchieri. In Chapter 1 I critically summarise a main theme from recent literature and distinguish the accounts of norms based on social preferences from accounts based on social structure. I also summarise different theorists’ accounts of social norms as a social construct, in addition to surveying some issues scholars have raised empirically. Chapter 2 reviews the conceptual analysis of social norms by Bicchieri as a social structure based account. Bicchieri’s conceptual analysis introduces three kinds of condition for norm identification. I review these in detail, and suggest hypothesis testing corresponding to each kind of condition. Chapter 2 briefly analyses a critical problem for Bicchieri’s theory. Chapter 3 provides philosophical background that supports the intentional concepts applied in Bicchieri’s analysis of social norms. I suggest that the Dennettian account of Intentional Stance is the best philosophical framework for Bicchieri’s account of social norms. I also argue that Revealed Preference Theory from economics is an application of the Intentional Stance. I conjecture that adopting the Intentional Stance and applying Revealed Preference Theory to empirical data can allow for improved operationalisation of Bicchieri’s conceptual analysis. In Chapter 4 I provide critical review of some key experimental work by Bicchieri and co-authors applying her conceptual analysis of social norms. I then provide a critical review of a widely used toolbox from the current economic literature for norm elicitation. Then I introduce a more rigorous experimental protocol for investigating social norms understood following Bicchieri’s analysis. The toolbox suggested in my thesis addresses limitations identified in Bicchieri’s empirical work. Chapter 5 presents design of the experiment administered as the core element of the thesis. Chapter 6 shows and analyses the results from the experiments described in Chapter 5. It also introduces the statistical models used in my thesis to assess the extent to which Bicchieri’s analyses successfully guides experimental identification of social norms. Chapter 7 offers concluding theoretical reflections, and discusses possible extensions of the research presented in this thesis.Item Early modern masters of suspicion(University College Cork, 2022) Di Carlo, Andrea; Dockstader, Jason; Leask, IanThis thesis interprets Niccolò Machiavelli, Michel de Montaigne, Francis Bacon, and John Milton, casting them as Masters of Suspicion. The category of ‘Master of Suspicion’ was introduced by Ricœur (1970) to describe how Marx, Nietzsche and Freud approached their respective economic, epistemological and medical contexts. After a recap on the thinking of Ricœur’s own Masters of Suspicion, I will move on to analyse the thinking of Machiavelli, Montaigne, Bacon, and Milton, whom I define as “early modern Masters of Suspicion”, Machiavelli, Montaigne, Bacon, and Milton. In the same way Ricœur analysed the context of Marx, Nietzsche and Freud, I will do the same with Niccolò Machiavelli, Michel de Montaigne, Francis Bacon, and John Milton. Machiavelli claimed that politics should not be driven by moral constraints; politics, as such, is a realm independent of morality. Montaigne created a new philosophical and literary genre, the essay, to examine a world that needed to reconsider its foundations. Unlike Machiavelli, he believed that different moral ideas could come together. Bacon claimed that scientific inquiries should not constrained by dogmatic interpretations of Aristotle. As a consequence, he set out to outline a novel method of scientific investigation. I argue in this thesis that Milton, like Machiavelli, Montaigne and Bacon, acted in a similar manner. He reassessed long-standing ideas of sovereignty by showing that even medieval political practices should be reconsidered in the midst of the English Civil War. He emphasised the necessity, like Montaigne, of a more personal “realm” where he could study himself and the changes of his time. Like Bacon, Milton believed that the epistemological obstacles of dogmatic Aristotelianism had to be overcome to allow science to freely flow. By framing Machiavelli, Montaigne, Bacon, Milton as Master of Suspicion, this thesis reconsiders their reception by exploring new possible avenues of research on their political, moral and scientific ideas.