<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:g-core="http://base.google.com/ns/1.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">
<channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/537">
<title>Coastal and Marine Research Centre - Reports</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/537</link>
<description/>
<items>
<rdf:Seq>
<rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2737"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2718"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2988"/>
<rdf:li resource="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2987"/>
</rdf:Seq>
</items>
<dc:date>2017-10-30T17:38:09Z</dc:date>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2737">
<title>Options to advance co-ordination and analysis of climate data in Europe</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2737</link>
<description>Options to advance co-ordination and analysis of climate data in Europe
Twomey, Sarah; Dwyer, Ned
Systematic, high-quality observations of the atmosphere, oceans and terrestrial environments are required to improve understanding of climate characteristics and the consequences of climate change. The overall aim of this report is to carry out a comparative assessment of approaches taken to addressing the state of European observations systems and related data analysis by some leading actors in the field. This research reports on approaches to climate observations and analyses in Ireland, Switzerland, Germany, The Netherlands and Austria and explores options for a more coordinated approach to national responses to climate observations in Europe. The key aspects addressed are: an assessment of approaches to develop GCOS and provision of analysis of GCOS data; an evaluation of how these countries are reporting development of GCOS; highlighting best practice in advancing GCOS implementation including analysis of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs); a comparative summary of the differences and synergies in terms of the reporting of climate observations; an overview of relevant European initiatives and recommendations on how identified gaps might be addressed in the short to medium term.
</description>
<dc:date>2014-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2718">
<title>TPEA good practice guide: lessons for cross-border MSP from transboundary planning in the European Atlantic</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2718</link>
<description>TPEA good practice guide: lessons for cross-border MSP from transboundary planning in the European Atlantic
Almodovar, Margarida; de Armas, Demetrio; Lopes Alves, Fatima; Bentes, Luis; Fonseca, Catarina; Galofré, Jordi; Gee, Kira; Gómez-Ballesteros, Maríia; Gonçalves, Jorge; Henriques, Guida; Jay, Stephen; Lloret Capote, Ana; da Luz Fernandes, Maria; Fernández, Pedro; Machado, Paulo; McClarey, Gerard; McGreevy, Andrew; Moreno Aranda, Isabel María; O'Mahony, Cathal; Ortiz, Lola; Prado, Inmaculada; Rooney, Aoibheann; Suárez de Vivero, Juan Luis; Tello, Olvido; Twomey, Sarah
Jay, Stephen; Gee, Kira
This Good Practice Guide is the outcome of a project co-funded by the European Commission (DG Mare) called Transboundary Planning in the European Atlantic (TPEA), which ran from December 2012 to May 2014. The aim of the project was to demonstrate approaches to transboundary maritime spatial planning (MSP) in the European Atlantic region. This is one of a series of projects exploring the opportunities and challenges of carrying out cross-border MSP in Europe’s regional seas, making connections with integrated coastal management (ICM). TPEA focused on two pilot areas: one involving Portugal and Spain and the other Ireland and the United Kingdom. Despite distinct identities in the region relating to different traditions of planning and stages of MSP implementation, TPEA worked towards a commonly-agreed approach to transboundary MSP and developed principles of cross-border working which it is hoped will be of wider benefit. This guide presents these principles, illustrated with examples from the TPEA project.
</description>
<dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2988">
<title>Baseline analysis of the existing capacities and needs for capacity building for Marine Strategy Framework Directive implementation in the Celtic Seas sub-region.</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2988</link>
<description>Baseline analysis of the existing capacities and needs for capacity building for Marine Strategy Framework Directive implementation in the Celtic Seas sub-region.
Twomey, Sarah; O'Mahony, Cathal
This report evaluates the existing situation in the Celtic Seas sub-region and determines the current state of preparedness for transboundary management of marine ecosystems and MSFD implementation. Recommendations for capacity building are provided through the analysis of the existing conflicts and potential synergies between relevant policies, institutions and information resources for MSFD implementation across the region. This report strives to empower stakeholders through the provision of a sound baseline with accurate and up-to-date information on the current status of MSFD implementation, potential opportunities and suggested approaches for building capacities in their region and across the Celtic Seas. It is evident that there are a number of national marine planning processes currently underway and at different stages throughout the United Kingdom and the pre-planning context for MSP in Ireland. On a similar note, this evaluation of MSFD implementation progress to-date in the United Kingdom, Ireland and France highlights that each Member State has implemented the legal and procedural requirements of preparatory steps in differing manners and using different time scales. This variance across the sub-region has the potential to impact the achievement of GES by 2020 across the Celtic Seas.
</description>
<dc:date>2013-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2987">
<title>Project scoping for lessons learnt to apply to the Celtic Seas marine sub-region</title>
<link>http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2987</link>
<description>Project scoping for lessons learnt to apply to the Celtic Seas marine sub-region
Twomey, Sarah; O'Mahony, Cathal
This report involves a formal scoping exercise to identify lessons from a wide range of previous and current project and initiative experiences at the national, regional seas, European and global levels. An inventory of 77 projects and initiatives that are relevant with regard to the key activities proposed by the Celtic Seas Partnership has been compiled, as well as a short-list of 23 of the most pertinent projects, lessons learnt and contact names. This report has identified a number of synergies and collaborative opportunities from other project and initiatives in the Celtic Seas and beyond. It provides a strong starting point to clarify to stakeholders the uniqueness of the Celtic Seas Partnership project and delivers a sound baseline for the other preparatory actions (A2 Stakeholder Mapping and A3 Baseline Analysis for Marine Strategy Framework Directive Implementation) and the implementation actions. Furthermore, this report helps to avoid duplication of effort during the life-span of the project by highlighting what information pertaining to the Celtic Seas MSFD sub-region already exists.
</description>
<dc:date>2013-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
