The second victim: a contested term?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tumelty, Mary-Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-12T11:23:01Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-12T11:23:01Z
dc.date.issued 2018-12-18
dc.identifier.citation Tumelty, M. E. (2018) 'The Second Victim: A Contested Term?', Journal of Patient Safety, December, doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000558 en
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en
dc.identifier.endpage 11 en
dc.identifier.issn 1549-8425
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/12207
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000558 en
dc.description.abstract The term “second victim” was seminally coined by Wu, in recognition of the profound and long-lasting impact adverse events and medical errors may have on medical practitioners. Since the conception of this vocable over a decade ago, the term second victim has been internationally accepted and is widely used in discussion of this important topic. Notwithstanding its widespread use, controversy surrounds the term second victim in light of the traditional connotations with the word “victim.” However, notable in their absence are the views of medical practitioners on the use of this term. This article addresses this gap through an exploration of perceptions on the terminology used to describe physicians who experience distress after an adverse event or medical error. Methods: This research arose as part of a wider study on the dynamic of medical negligence litigation in Ireland. The study used a qualitative approach, using semistructured interviews as the data gathering instrument. The sample involved representatives of medical training bodies (2 individual interviews and 1 focus group of 4 individuals) and legal professionals (barristers) (12 individual interviews). Those interviewed from medical training bodies were physicians who have an active role in the college providing training and support to their members. Results: A number of participants shared their views on the term second victim, and the findings of this study suggest that some physicians and legal professionals are uncomfortable with the term second victim despite its widespread use in other jurisdictions. This is due to the traditional connotations that surround the term victim, and the perception that being labeled a victim may undermine the harm experienced by the patient. Conclusions: Although the impact of adverse events and medical error on the physician is undisputed, use of the term second victim can be seen as insensitive to the patient, as well as dissipating the professional identity of the healthcare provider. Second victim is an internationally recognized term, as coined by Wu (2000). Finding an appropriate replacement is an important but difficult task. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins en
dc.rights © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Journal of Patient Safety: December 18, 2018, doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000558 en
dc.subject Second victim en
dc.subject Adverse event en
dc.subject Medical error en
dc.subject Impact en
dc.subject Negligence en
dc.subject Malpractice en
dc.subject Physician en
dc.title The second victim: a contested term? en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Mary Tumelty, School Of Law, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: mary.tumelty@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.date.updated 2021-11-10T10:10:28Z
dc.description.version Accepted Version en
dc.internal.rssid 511454942
dc.internal.pmid 30570536
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Journal of Patient Safety en
dc.internal.copyrightchecked Yes The Journal provides for a pre-edited copy to be uploaded to a University repository 12 months after publication date.
dc.internal.licenseacceptance Yes en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress mary.tumelty@ucc.ie en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement