State building as strategy: An interrogation of NATO's comprehensive approach in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2011

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Cosgrave, Michael en
dc.contributor.author Eustace, Daniel Derek
dc.date.accessioned 2015-08-20T14:52:50Z
dc.date.available 2015-08-20T14:52:50Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.date.submitted 2014
dc.identifier.citation Eustace, D. D. 2014. State building as strategy: An interrogation of NATO's comprehensive approach in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2011. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. en
dc.identifier.endpage 275
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/1934
dc.description.abstract The core of this thesis is the study of NATO’s Comprehensive Approach strategy to state building in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2011. It argues that this strategy sustained operational and tactical practices which were ineffective in responding to the evolved nature of the security problem. The thesis interrogates the Comprehensive Approach along ontological, empirical and epistemological lines and concludes that the failure of the Comprehensive Approach in the specific Afghan case is, in fact, indicative of underlying theoretical and pragmatic flaws which, therefore, generalize the dilemma. The research is pragmatic in nature, employing mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative) concurrently. Qualitative methods include research into primary and secondary literature sources supplemented with the author’s personal experiences in Afghanistan in 2008 and various NATO HQ and Canadian settings. Quantitative research includes an empirical case study focussing on NATO’s Afghan experience and its attempt at state building between 2006 and 2011. This study incorporates a historical review of NATO’s evolutionary involvement in Afghanistan incorporating the subject timeframe; offers an analysis of human development and governance related data mapped to expected outcomes of the Afghan National Development Strategy and NATO’s comprehensive campaign design; and interrogates the Comprehensive Approach strategy by means of an analysis of conceptual, institutional and capability gaps in the context of an integrated investigational framework. The results of the case study leads to an investigation of a series of research questions related to the potential impact of the failure of the Comprehensive Approach for NATO in Afghanistan and the limits of state building as a means of attaining security for the Alliance. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University College Cork en
dc.rights © 2014, Daniel D. Eustace. en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ en
dc.subject NATO en
dc.subject State building en
dc.subject Counter-insurgency en
dc.subject Strategy en
dc.subject Comprehensive approach en
dc.subject Campaign assessment en
dc.title State building as strategy: An interrogation of NATO's comprehensive approach in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2011 en
dc.type Doctoral thesis en
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en
dc.type.qualificationname PhD (Arts) en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.check.info No embargo required en
dc.description.version Accepted Version
dc.description.status Not peer reviewed en
dc.internal.school History en
dc.check.type No Embargo Required
dc.check.reason No embargo required en
dc.check.opt-out Not applicable en
dc.thesis.opt-out false
dc.check.embargoformat Not applicable en
ucc.workflow.supervisor m.cosgrave@ucc.ie
dc.internal.conferring Autumn Conferring 2014


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2014, Daniel D. Eustace. Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2014, Daniel D. Eustace.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement