Complexity as key to designing cognitive-friendly environments for older people

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
1372.pdf(519.95 KB)
Published Version
Date
2016-08-30
Authors
Cassarino, Marica
Setti, Annalisa
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Frontiers Media
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The lived environment is the arena where our cognitive skills, preferences, and attitudes come together to determine our ability to interact with the world. The mechanisms through which lived environments can benefit cognitive health in older age are yet to be fully understood. The existing literature suggests that environments which are perceived as stimulating, usable and aesthetically appealing can improve or facilitate cognitive performance both in young and older age. Importantly, optimal stimulation for cognition seems to depend on experiencing sufficiently stimulating environments while not too challenging. Environmental complexity is an important contributor to determining whether an environment provides such an optimal stimulation. The present paper reviews a selection of studies which have explored complexity in relation to perceptual load, environmental preference and perceived usability to propose a framework which explores direct and indirect environmental influences on cognition, and to understand these influences in relation to aging processes. We identify ways to define complexity at different environmental scales, going from micro low-level perceptual features of scenes, to design qualities of proximal environments (e.g., streets, neighborhoods), to broad geographical areas (i.e., natural vs. urban environments). We propose that studying complexity at these different scales will provide new insight into the design of cognitive-friendly environments.
Description
Keywords
Aging , Environmental preference , Usability , Perceptual load , Cognition , Environmental complexity
Citation
Cassarino, M. and Setti, A. (2016) ‘Complexity as key to designing cognitive-friendly environments for older people’, Frontiers in Psychology, 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01329
Link to publisher’s version