STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2

The submission of new items to CORA is currently unavailable due to a repository upgrade. For further information, please contact cora@ucc.ie. Thank you for your understanding.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author O'Mahony, Denis
dc.contributor.author O'Sullivan, David.
dc.contributor.author Byrne, Stephen
dc.contributor.author O'Connor, Marie N.
dc.contributor.author Ryan, Cristin
dc.contributor.author Gallagher, Paul F.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-24T15:17:50Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-24T15:17:50Z
dc.date.issued 2014-10-16
dc.identifier.citation O'Mahony, D., O'Sullivan, D., Byrne, S., O'Connor, M. N., Ryan, C. and Gallagher, P. (2015) 'STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2', Age and Ageing, 44(2), pp. 213-218. doi:10.1093/ageing/afu145 en
dc.identifier.volume 44 en
dc.identifier.startpage 213 en
dc.identifier.endpage 218 en
dc.identifier.issn 0002-0729
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/3690
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/ageing/afu145
dc.description.abstract Purpose: screening tool of older people’s prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool to alert to right treatment (START) criteria were first published in 2008. Due to an expanding therapeutics evidence base, updating of the criteria was required. Methods: we reviewed the 2008 STOPP/START criteria to add new evidence-based criteria and remove any obsolete criteria. A thorough literature review was performed to reassess the evidence base of the 2008 criteria and the proposed new criteria. Nineteen experts from 13 European countries reviewed a new draft of STOPP & START criteria including proposed new criteria. These experts were also asked to propose additional criteria they considered important to include in the revised STOPP & START criteria and to highlight any criteria from the 2008 list they considered less important or lacking an evidence base. The revised list of criteria was then validated using the Delphi consensus methodology. Results: the expert panel agreed a final list of 114 criteria after two Delphi validation rounds, i.e. 80 STOPP criteria and 34 START criteria. This represents an overall 31% increase in STOPP/START criteria compared with version 1. Several new STOPP categories were created in version 2, namely antiplatelet/anticoagulant drugs, drugs affecting, or affected by, renal function and drugs that increase anticholinergic burden; new START categories include urogenital system drugs, analgesics and vaccines. Conclusion: STOPP/START version 2 criteria have been expanded and updated for the purpose of minimizing inappropriate prescribing in older people. These criteria are based on an up-to-date literature review and consensus validation among a European panel of experts. en
dc.description.sponsorship Health Research Board of Ireland (HRB grant number HRA_HSR/2010/14) en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Oxford University Press en
dc.rights © The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ en
dc.subject Inappropriate prescribing en
dc.subject Older people en
dc.subject STOPP/START criteria en
dc.title STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2 en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Denis O'Mahony, Medicine Department, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: denis.omahony@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.date.updated 2017-02-24T15:12:04Z
dc.description.version Published Version en
dc.internal.rssid 322050784
dc.internal.wokid 000352159500008
dc.contributor.funder Health Research Board en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Age and Ageing en
dc.internal.copyrightchecked No !!CORA!! en
dc.internal.licenseacceptance Yes en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress denis.omahony@ucc.ie en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Authors 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement