Comparison of a web-based 24-h dietary recall tool (Foodbook24) to an interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Timon, Claire
dc.contributor.author Evans, Katie
dc.contributor.author Kehoe, Laura
dc.contributor.author Blain, Richard J.
dc.contributor.author Flynn, Albert
dc.contributor.author Gibney, Eileen R.
dc.contributor.author Walton, Janette
dc.date.accessioned 2017-05-10T11:54:33Z
dc.date.available 2017-05-10T11:54:33Z
dc.date.issued 2017-04-25
dc.identifier.citation Timon, C., Evans, K., Kehoe, L., Blain, R., Flynn, A., Gibney, E. and Walton, J. (2017) ‘Comparison of a web-Bbased 24-h dietary recall tool (Foodbook24) to an interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall’, Nutrients, 9(5), 425 (14pp). doi:10.3390/nu9050425 en
dc.identifier.volume 9 en
dc.identifier.issued 5 en
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en
dc.identifier.endpage 14 en
dc.identifier.issn 2072-6643
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/3938
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/nu9050425
dc.description.abstract Web-based tools have the potential to reduce the cost of dietary assessment; however, it is necessary to establish their performance compared to traditional dietary assessment methods. This study aims to compare nutrient and food intakes derived from Foodbook24 to those obtained from an interview-led 24-h dietary recall (24HDR). Seventy-nine adult participants completed one self-administered 24HDR using Foodbook24 and one interviewer-led 24HDR on the same day. Following a 10 days wash-out period the same process was completed again in opposite order to the previous study visit. Statistical analysis including Spearman’s rank order correlation, Mann-Whitney U tests, cross-classification analysis, and “Match”, “Omission”, and “Intrusion” rates were used to investigate the relationship between both methods. Strong, positive correlations of nutrient intake estimated using both methods was observed (rs = 0.6–1.0; p < 0.001). The percentage of participants classified into the same tertile of nutrient intake distribution using both methods ranged from 58% (energy) to 82% (vitamin D). The overall match rate for food intake between both methods was 85%, while rates for omissions and intrusions were 11.5% and 3.5%, respectively. These results, alongside the reduced cost and participant burden associated with Foodbook24, highlight the tool’s potential as a viable alternative to the interviewer-led 24HDR. en
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Agriculture, Food, and the Marine (Diet Ireland Project 13F424) en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher MDPI en
dc.rights © 2017, the Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en
dc.subject Foodbook24 en
dc.subject Dietary assessment en
dc.subject Web-based en
dc.subject Comparison en
dc.subject Interviewer led en
dc.subject 24 h dietary recall en
dc.subject Self-administered en
dc.title Comparison of a web-based 24-h dietary recall tool (Foodbook24) to an interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Janette Walton, Firm Programme, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: janette.walton@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.date.updated 2017-05-10T11:44:14Z
dc.description.version Published Version en
dc.internal.rssid 394488811
dc.contributor.funder Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Nutrients en
dc.internal.copyrightchecked Yes en
dc.internal.licenseacceptance Yes en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress janette.walton@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress a.flynn@ucc.ie en
dc.identifier.articleid 425


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017, the Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017, the Authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement