Writing to patients: a randomised controlled trial

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
MR_WritingPV2006.pdf(203.35 KB)
Published Version
Date
2006-03
Authors
O'Reilly, Máire
Cahill, Mary R.
Perry, Ivan J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Royal College of Physicians
Published Version
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
It has been suggested that consultants should consider writing directly to patients with a summary of their outpatient consultation. In a controlled trial involving consecutive new referrals to a haematology outpatient clinic, we randomised patients to receive either a personal letter from their consultant summarising their consultation (n = 77) or a brief note thanking them for attending the clinic (n = 73). Patients were assessed for recall of and satisfaction with the consultation by a single independent observer, using standardised methods. At the second visit to outpatients, the patients' median percentage recall of items discussed during the consultation was 67% (IQ range 50-80%) in the intervention group, versus 57% (IQ range 43-76%) in the control group (p = 0.3). Strongly positive views on the personal letter were expressed by patients and referring clinicians. The findings suggest that although personal letters do not substantially improve recall of the clinical encounter, they are feasible, highly valued by patients and acceptable to referring clinicians.
Description
Keywords
Personal letters , Randomised controlled trial , Recall , Satisfaction , Writing to patients
Citation
O'Reilly, M.; Cahill, M.R.; Perry, I.J.; (2006) 'Writing to patients: a randomised controlled trial'. Clinical Medicine, 6(2):178-182.
Copyright
© 2006, Royal College of Physicians