Family connections versus optimised treatment-as-usual for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder: non-randomised controlled study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Flynn, Daniel
dc.contributor.author Kells, Mary
dc.contributor.author Joyce, Mary
dc.contributor.author Corcoran, Paul
dc.contributor.author Herley, Sarah
dc.contributor.author Suarez, Catalina
dc.contributor.author Cotter, Padraig
dc.contributor.author Hurley, Justina
dc.contributor.author Weihrauch, Mareike
dc.contributor.author Groeger, John
dc.date.accessioned 2017-10-18T09:40:14Z
dc.date.available 2017-10-18T09:40:14Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Flynn, D., Kells, M., Joyce, M., Corcoran, P., Herley, S., Suarez, C., Cotter, P., Hurley, J., Weihrauch, M. and Groeger, J. (2017) 'Family Connections versus optimised treatment-as-usual for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder: non-randomised controlled study', Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 4, 18. doi: 10.1186/s40479-017-0069-1 en
dc.identifier.volume 4
dc.identifier.startpage 1
dc.identifier.endpage 9
dc.identifier.issn 2051-6673
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/4892
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s40479-017-0069-1
dc.description.abstract Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is challenging for family members who are often required to fulfil multiple roles such as those of advocate, caregiver, coach and guardian. To date, two uncontrolled studies by the treatment developers suggest that Family Connections (FC) is an effective programme to support, educate and teach skills to family members of individuals with BPD. However, such studies have been limited by lack of comparison to other treatment approaches. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of FC with an optimised treatment-as-usual (OTAU) programme for family members of individuals with BPD. A secondary aim was to introduce a long term follow-up to investigate if positive gains from the intervention would be maintained following programme completion. Methods: This study was a non-randomised controlled study, with assessment of outcomes at baseline (preintervention) and end of programme (post-intervention) for both FC and OTAU groups, and at follow-up (3 months post-intervention; 12 or 19 months post-intervention) for the FC group. Eighty family members participated in the FC (n = 51) and the OTAU (n = 29) programmes. Outcome measures included burden, grief, depression and mastery. Linear mixed-effects models were used to assess baseline differences in the outcome measures by gender, age group and type of relationship to the individual with BPD. Linear mixed-effects models were also used to estimate the treatment effect (FC versus OTAU) utilising all available data from baseline and end of programme. Results: The FC group showed changes indicating significant improvement with respect to all four outcome measures (p < 0.001). The OTAU group showed changes in the same direction as the intervention group but none of the changes were statistically significant. The intervention effect was statistically significant for total burden (including both subscales; p = .02 for subjective burden and p = .048 for objective burden) and grief (p = 0.013). Improvements were maintained at follow-up for FC participants. Conclusions: The findings of the current study indicate that FC results in statistically significant improvements on key measures while OTAU does not yield comparable changes. Lack of significant change on all measures for OTAU suggests that a three session psycho-education programme is of limited benefit. Further research is warranted on programme components and long-term supports for family members. en
dc.description.sponsorship Health Service Executive (National Office for Suicide Prevention) en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher BioMed Central en
dc.relation.uri https://bpded.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40479-017-0069-1
dc.rights © 2017, the Authors. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
dc.subject Borderline personality disorder en
dc.subject Family Connections en
dc.subject Family members en
dc.subject Significant others en
dc.subject Effectiveness en
dc.subject Long-term follow up en
dc.subject Burden en
dc.subject Grief en
dc.title Family connections versus optimised treatment-as-usual for family members of individuals with borderline personality disorder: non-randomised controlled study en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Paul Corcoran, Epidemiology & Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: pcorcoran@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.description.version Published Version en
dc.contributor.funder Health Service Executive
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress pcorcoran@ucc.ie en
dc.identifier.articleid 18


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017, the Authors. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2017, the Authors. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement