Citation:Maity, T.,Goswami, S.,Bhattacharya, D. and Roy, S. (2015) 'Maity et al reply', Physical Review Letters, 114, 099704 (2pp). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.099704
In this article we reply to the concerns raised by Harres et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 099703 (2015)] about some of the results reported in our original paper [T. Maity et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 107201 (2013)]. We show that the magnetic hysteresis loops are not minor and both path dependency of exchange bias and presence of superspin glass phase in the nanocomposite are indisputable.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement