Australian work health and safety policy for the regulation of psychosocial risks: perspectives from key informants

Show simple item record Potter, Rachel E. O'Keefe, Valerie Leka, Stavroula Dollard, Maureen 2019-05-09T12:02:28Z 2019-05-09T12:02:28Z 2019-04-05
dc.identifier.citation Potter, R. E., O’Keeffe, V., Leka, S. and Dollard, M. (2019) 'Australian work health and safety policy for the regulation of psychosocial risks: perspectives from key informants', Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, In Press. doi: 10.1080/14773996.2019.1590765 en
dc.identifier.startpage 1 en
dc.identifier.endpage 33 en
dc.identifier.issn 1477-3996
dc.identifier.issn 1477-4003
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/14773996.2019.1590765 en
dc.description.abstract The regulation of psychosocial hazards and risks, for the protection of psychological health, is a highly debated issue within work health and safety (WHS). Increasing work-related psychological illness and injury, alongside growing academic evidence and community awareness, has fuelled the need to better prevent and regulate psychosocial hazards and risks. Research must clarify challenges and improvements to policy and practice from stakeholder perspectives. We conduct a qualitative interview-based investigation with 25 informed participants on the effectiveness of Australian WHS policies for psychosocial risk regulation. Participants are active in diverse roles including policy development, program implementation, industry advice, and psychosocial risk inspection. Inductive analysis revealed divergent viewpoints that are categorized into three broad themes: (1) scant specificity in the current regulatory WHS policy framework, (2) compliance complexities and (3) the role of regulators in action. Tension points also emerged between these themes and subthemes, including: (a) how psychosocial risks should be addressed in legislation, (b) how to establish compliance, and (c) the role of the regulator in evaluating compliance, and facilitating education and better practice. Future research must continue to disseminate knowledge from WHS informants to guide better practice. Also, researchers should investigate organizational barriers that hinder WHS psychosocial risk regulation. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis en
dc.rights © 2019 Informa Limited. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Policy and Practice in Health and Safety on 05 April 2018, available online: en
dc.subject Regulation en
dc.subject Psychosocial hazards en
dc.subject Psychosocial risks en
dc.subject Work health and safety en
dc.subject Psychological health en
dc.title Australian work health and safety policy for the regulation of psychosocial risks: perspectives from key informants en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Stavroula Leka, Management & Marketing, Cork University Business School (CUBS), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en Access to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisher. en 2020-04-05
dc.description.version Accepted Version en
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Policy and Practice in Health and Safety en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress en
dc.internal.bibliocheck In Press. Update citation, add vol. issue, update page nos. en

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement