Encountering the invisible

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Helke, Susanna
dc.contributor.editor Abbatescianni, Davide en
dc.contributor.editor Connell, Dan en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-23T08:29:44Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-23T08:29:44Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation Helke, S. (2019) 'Encountering the invisible', Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media, 17, pp. 209-214. doi: 10.33178/alpha.17.15 en
dc.identifier.issued 17
dc.identifier.startpage 209
dc.identifier.endpage 214
dc.identifier.issn 2009-4078
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/8230
dc.identifier.doi 10.33178/alpha.17.15
dc.description.abstract This paper discusses the potential of art-practice-led and research-in-the-arts methodologies, introducing the idea of the theory–praxis–poetics triangle as a process of catalysing new methods, expressions and approaches in filmmaking, especially in the context of documentary cinema. It elaborates upon these approaches in the context of my own filmmaking practice and in relation to the conventions stemming from the tradition of social documentary. What are the methods of making visible the invisible complexities of present-day societal reality, as poverty, exclusion and societal tensions may not be as visually dramatic as they were when the ethos of “social documentary” was defined? How can the invisible and often-abstract core of phenomena such as the neoliberal paradigm shift in post–welfare-state contexts be made visible? Documentary film as a discourse of sobriety mostly relies on the serious and solemn, but can absurdism and parody more accurately capture the core of paradigmatic political phenomena like the current one? The acute global crises create a need for re-evaluating the potential of documentary film practice as a reflexive and critical endeavour beyond the emotion economy of the hegemonic film industries. As the arts function beyond the pre-existing order of commonsensical reality, the pressing question is: how can reality-material–based art construct a transformational ethical address, one which does not rely on individualistically driven social subjectivity but rather creates experiential spaces for agonistic collisions of differences, the paradoxical, dialectical cinematic approaches that can be claimed to be more complex than a mere “emotive” address? In this dangerously polarized era, it is crucial to distinguish between such fluid concepts as the sentimental, emotional or compassionate, in order to rehabilitate the poetics of documentary art in creating a reflexive political address. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Film and Screen Media, University College Cork en
dc.relation.uri http://www.alphavillejournal.com/Issue17/DossierHelke.pdf
dc.rights © 2019, the Author(s). en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject Documentary film en
dc.subject Social documentary en
dc.subject Political documentary en
dc.subject Research in the arts en
dc.subject Satire en
dc.title Encountering the invisible en
dc.type Article (non peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Susanna Helke, Aalto University en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.description.version Published Version en
dc.description.status Not peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Alphaville: Journal of Film and Screen Media en
dc.identifier.journalabbrev Alphaville


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019, the Author(s). Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2019, the Author(s).
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement