Broadening public input into science policy decision making: can the democratic model for science communication influence scientific, innovation and technological trajectories?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Spillane, Charles en O'Mahony, Catherine 2014-03-12T14:19:02Z 2014-03-12T14:19:02Z 2011 2011
dc.identifier.citation O'Mahony, C. 2011. Broadening public input into science policy decision making : can the democratic model for science communication influence scientific, innovation and technological trajectories?. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. en
dc.identifier.endpage 222
dc.description.abstract This PhD thesis investigates the potential use of science communication models to engage a broader swathe of actors in decision making in relation to scientific and technological innovation in order to address possible democratic deficits in science and technology policy-making. A four-pronged research approach has been employed to examine different representations of the public(s) and different modes of engagement. The first case study investigates whether patient-groups could represent an alternative needs-driven approach to biomedical and health sciences R & D. This is followed by enquiry into the potential for Science Shops to represent a bottom-up approach to promote research and development of local relevance. The barriers and opportunities for the involvement of scientific researchers in science communication are next investigated via a national survey which is comparable to a similar survey conducted in the UK. The final case study investigates to what extent opposition or support regarding nanotechnology (as an emerging technology) is reflected amongst the YouTube user community and the findings are considered in the context of how support or opposition to new or emerging technologies can be addressed using conflict resolution based approaches to manage potential conflict trajectories. The research indicates that the majority of communication exercises of relevance to science policy and planning take the form of a one-way flow of information with little or no facility for public feedback. This thesis proposes that a more bottom-up approach to research and technology would help broaden acceptability and accountability for decisions made relating to new or existing technological trajectories. This approach could be better integrated with and complementary to government, institutional, e.g. university, and research funding agencies activities and help ensure that public needs and issues are better addressed directly by the research community. Such approaches could also facilitate empowerment of societal stakeholders regarding scientific literacy and agenda-setting. One-way information relays could be adapted to facilitate feedback from representative groups e.g. Non-governmental organisations or Civil Society Organisations (such as patient groups) in order to enhance the functioning and socio-economic relevance of knowledge-based societies to the betterment of human livelihoods. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University College Cork en
dc.rights © 2011, Catherine O'Mahony. en
dc.rights.uri en
dc.subject Community-based research en
dc.subject Nanotechnology en
dc.subject Conflict resolution en
dc.subject Patient groups en
dc.subject Scientific literacy en
dc.subject Science communication en
dc.subject Science policy en
dc.subject Science shops en
dc.subject Public engagement in science en
dc.subject.lcsh Communication in science en
dc.subject.lcsh Science and state en
dc.title Broadening public input into science policy decision making: can the democratic model for science communication influence scientific, innovation and technological trajectories? en
dc.type Doctoral thesis en
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en
dc.type.qualificationname PhD (Science) en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en No embargo required en
dc.description.version Accepted Version
dc.contributor.funder Irish Research Council for Humanities and Social Sciences en
dc.description.status Not peer reviewed en Biochemistry en
dc.check.type No Embargo Required
dc.check.reason No embargo required en
dc.check.opt-out Not applicable en
dc.thesis.opt-out false
dc.check.embargoformat Not applicable en
dc.internal.conferring Summer Conferring 2014

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2011, Catherine O'Mahony. Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2011, Catherine O'Mahony.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement