Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?

McCarthy, Joan

Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?

Files

McCarthy_2003.pdf(154.25 KB)

Published Version

Date

2003-12

Authors

McCarthy, Joan

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group, Institute of Medical Ethics

Published Version

10.1136/mh.29.2.65

Abstract

This paper addresses a current debate in the bioethics community between principlists, who consider that principles are at the heart of moral life, and narrativists, who see communication at its core. Using a case study entitled "The forgetful mourner" to introduce the tensions between each of these positions, I go on to explain the central tenets of both principlism and narrative ethics. Rather than focus on their respective weaknesses, which many theorists do, I emphasise instead, the contribution that each approach can make to understanding moral life and the process of ethical decision making in health care situations. My ultimate aim is to identify the, sometimes overlapping, skills that both principlism and narrative ethics require on the part of health professionals who deploy them. I conclude that a good principlist has narrativist tendencies and a good narrativist is inclined toward principlism.

Keywords

Principlism , Narrative ethics

Citation

Mc Carthy, Joan; (2003) 'Principlism or narrative ethics: must we choose between them?'. Medical Humanities, 29(2):65-71.doi: 10.1136/mh.29.2.65