Folk medicine and its second life

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Files
4159.pdf(255.23 KB)
Published version
Date
2017-10-31
Authors
Kingston, Rosari
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Asociación Española de Estudios Irlandeses (AEDEI)
Published Version
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Irish folk medicine is perceived to be dying, if not dead already. It lies as a parallel system to modern biomedicine and is known only through word of mouth. However, no matter what modality is practised, be it bone-setting, plant medicine, charms or rituals, there are traditional characteristics common to all as a whole. An examination of these traditional elements allows us to see how Irish folk medicine is currently practised and to ascertain whether it has reached the second life that Lauri Honko suggested. If this were the case, “the recycling of material in an environment that differs from its original context” (Honko, “The Folklore” 42) should be evident.
Existe una percepción bastante extendida de que la medicina popular en Irlanda está moribunda, si es que no se considera muerta directamente. Esta práctica se presenta sin embargo como sistema paralelo al de la medicina moderna y se transmite de boca en boca. Cualquiera que sea su modalidad, ya sea colocación de huesos, medicina a base de plantas, hechizos o rituales, comparten características propias. Un análisis de estos elementos tradicionales nos permite examinar cómo se practica actualmente la medicina popular irlandesa y si ha alcanzado la segunda vida del folklore en definición de Lauri Honko. Si este es el caso, “el reciclaje del material en un medio que difiere de su contexto original” (Honko, “The Folklore” 42) debería manifestarse de forma evidente.
Description
Keywords
Irish folk medicine , Tradition , Second life , Secrecy , Provenance , Medicina popular irlandesa , Tradición , Segunda vida , Discreción
Citation
Kingston, R. (2017) 'Folk medicine and its second life', Estudios Irlandeses: Journal of Irish Studies, 12.2 pp. 99-106. doi: 10.24162/EI2017-7597
Link to publisher’s version