The role of the community service order and the suspended sentence in Ireland: a judicial perspective

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Kilcommins, Shane
dc.contributor.advisor Fennell, Caroline
dc.contributor.author Riordan, David
dc.date.accessioned 2012-11-06T17:26:10Z
dc.date.available 2012-11-06T17:26:10Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.date.submitted 2009
dc.identifier.citation Riordan, D, 2009. The role of the community service order and the suspended sentence in Ireland: a judicial perspective. PhD Thesis, University College Cork. en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/734
dc.description.abstract Imprisonment is the most severe penalty utilised by the criminal courts in Ireland. In recent decades the prison population has grown significantly despite expressions both official and public to reduce the use of the sanction. Two other sanctions are available to the Irish sentencer which may be used as a direct and comparable sentence in lieu of a term of imprisonment namely, the community service order and the suspended sentence. The community service order remains under-utilised as an alternative to the custodial sentence. The suspended sentence is used quite liberally but its function may be more closely related to the aim of deterrence rather than avoiding the use of the custodial sentence. Thus the aim of decarceration may not be optimal in practice when either sanction is utilised. The decarcerative effect of either sanction is largely dependent upon the specific purpose which judges invest in the sanction. Judges may also be inhibited in the use of either sanction if they lack confidence that the sentence will be appropriately monitored and executed. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the role of the community service order and the suspended sentence in Irish sentencing practice. Although community service and the suspended sentence present primarily as alternatives to the custodial sentence, the manner in which the judges utilise or fail to utilise the sanctions may differ significantly from this primary manifestation. Therefore the study proceeds to examine the judges' cognitions and expectations of both sanctions to explore their underlying purposes and to reveal the manner in which the judges use the sanctions in practice. To access this previously undisclosed information a number of methodologies were deployed. An extensive literature review was conducted to delineate the purpose and functionality of both sanctions. Quantitative data was gathered by way of sampling for the suspended sentence and the part-suspended sentence where deficiencies were apparent to show the actual frequency in use of that sanction. Qualitative methodologies were used by way of focus groups and semi-structured interviews of judges at all jurisdictional levels to elucidate the purposes of both sanctions. These methods allowed a deeper investigation of the factors which may promote or inhibit such usage. The relative under-utilisation of the community service order as an alternative to the custodial sentence may in part be explained by a reluctance by some judges to equate it with a real custodial sentence. For most judges who use the sanction, particularly at summary level, community service serves a decarcerative function. The suspended sentence continues to be used extensively. It operates partly as a decarcerative penalty but the purpose of deterrence may in practice overtake its theoretical purpose namely the avoidance of custody. Despite ongoing criticism of executive agencies such as the Probation Service and the Prosecution in the supervision of such penalties both sanctions continue to be used. Engagement between the Criminal Justice actors may facilitate better outcomes in the use of either sanction. The purposes for which both sanctions are deployed find their meaning essentially in the practices of the judges themselves as opposed to any statutory or theoretical claims upon their use or purpose. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher University College Cork en
dc.relation.uri http://library.ucc.ie/record=b1894321~S0
dc.rights © 2009, David Riordan en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ en
dc.subject Community service en
dc.subject Suspended sentence en
dc.subject Non custodial sentence en
dc.subject.lcsh Probation--Ireland en
dc.subject.lcsh Community service (Punishment)--Ireland en
dc.title The role of the community service order and the suspended sentence in Ireland: a judicial perspective en
dc.type Doctoral thesis en
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en
dc.type.qualificationname PhD (Law) en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.description.version Accepted Version en
dc.contributor.funder Judicial Studies Institute, Ireland
dc.description.status Not peer reviewed en
dc.internal.school Law en


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2009, David Riordan Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2009, David Riordan
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement