JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
The submission of new items to CORA is currently unavailable due to a repository upgrade. For further information, please contact cora@ucc.ie. Thank you for your understanding.
Citation:Strydom, P. (2012) 'Cognition and recognition: on the problem of the cognitive in Honneth', Philosophy and Social Criticism, 38(6), pp. 591-607. doi:10.1177/0191453712442141
While concurring with Honneth’s reconstruction of reification as a form of forgetfulness, this article questions the way in which he arrives at that conclusion as well as the conceptual status he ascribes to recognition – the instance with reference to which reification is exhibited as distortion or deformation. It argues, first, that Honneth’s dualistic mode of argumentation falls behind the left-Hegelian tradition which he himself seeks to revitalize, thus causing a serious architectonic problem; and, second, that while polemicizing strongly against the cognitive approach, he at crucial points actually reverts to the very resources made available by that mode of thinking. Being the central concern of the article, this latter aspect is treated as the cognitive problem in his work, especially in his Tanner Lectures.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement