Access to this article is restricted until 24 months after publication by request of the publisher. Restriction lift date: 2026-09-02
Analysis and design optimization of a compliant robotic gripper mechanism with inverted flexure joints
Loading...
Files
Date
2024-09-02
Authors
Kuresangsai, Pongsiri
Cole, Matthew O. T.
Hao, Guangbo
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Published Version
Abstract
Flexure-jointed grippers provide compliant grasping capability, have low-cost and flexible manufacturing, and are insusceptible to joint friction and wear. However, their grasp stiffness can be limited by flexure compliance such that loss-of-grasp is prone to occur for high object loads. This paper examines the application of inverted-flexure joints in a cable-driven gripper that can avoid flexure buckling and greatly enhance grasp stiffness and stability. To analyze behavior, an energy-based kinetostatic model is developed for a benchmark grasping problem and validated by hardware experiments. A multi-objective design optimization study is conducted, considering key metrics of peak flexure stress, grasp stiffness, and cable actuation force. Results show that the inverted-flexure design has significantly higher grasp stiffness (63% higher in a targeted design optimization) and requires lower actuation forces (¿20% lower in all optimization cases), compared with equivalent direct-flexure designs. An application study is conducted to validate the predicted operating performance under gravity loading of the grasped object. The results demonstrate that stable and high stiffness grasping can be achieved, even under overload conditions that lead to loss-of-grasp for conventional direct-flexure designs.
Description
Keywords
Robotic gripper , Compliant mechanism , Design optimization , Flexure joint , Grasp stability , Kinetostatic modeling
Citation
Kuresangsai, P., Cole, M. O. and Hao, G. (2024) 'Analysis and design optimization of a compliant robotic gripper mechanism with inverted flexure joints', Mechanism and Machine Theory, 202, p.105779 (18pp). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2024.105779