Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: An analysis of international practice

Simple item page
dc.check.date2021-08-14
dc.check.infoAccess to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisher.en
dc.contributor.authorNaughton, Corina
dc.contributor.authorMeehan, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorLehane, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorLanders, Ciara
dc.contributor.authorFlaherty, Sarah Jane
dc.contributor.authorLane, Aoife
dc.contributor.authorLanders, Margaret
dc.contributor.authorKilty, Caroline
dc.contributor.authorSaab, Mohamad M.
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, John
dc.contributor.authorWalshe, Nuala
dc.contributor.authorWills, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Vera
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Siobhan
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Joan
dc.contributor.authorCummins, Helen
dc.contributor.authorMadden, Deirdre
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Josephine
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-18T11:22:20Z
dc.date.available2020-09-18T11:22:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-14
dc.date.updated2020-09-18T11:04:57Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To examine international approaches to the ethical oversight and regulation of quality improvement and clinical audit in healthcare systems. Data sources: We searched grey literature including websites of national research and ethics regulatory bodies and health departments of selected countries. Study selection: National guidance documents were included from six countries: Ireland, England, Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada. Data extraction: Data were extracted from 19 documents using an a priori framework developed from the published literature. Results: We organised data under five themes: ethical frameworks; guidance on ethical review; consent, vulnerable groups and personal health data. Quality improvement activity tended to be outside the scope of the ethics frameworks in most countries. Only New Zealand had integrated national ethics standards for both research and quality improvement. Across countries, there is consensus that this activity should not be automatically exempted from ethical review, but requires proportionate review or organisational oversight for minimal risk projects. In the majority of countries, there is a lack of guidance on participant consent, use of personal health information and inclusion of vulnerable groups in routine quality improvement. Conclusion: Where countries fail to provide specific ethics frameworks for quality improvement, guidance is dispersed across several organisations which may lack legal certainty. Our review demonstrates a need for appropriate oversight and responsive infrastructure for quality improvement underpinned by ethical frameworks that build equivalence with research oversight. It outlines aspects of good practice, especially The New Zealand framework that integrates research and quality improvement ethics.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationNaughton, C., Meehan, E., Lehane, E., Landers, C., Flaherty, S. J, Lane, A., Landers, M., Kilty, C., Saab, M. M., Goodwin, J., Walshe, N., Wills, T., McCarthy, V., Murphy, S., McCarthy, J., Cummins, H., Madden, D. and Hegarty, J. (2020) ‘Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: An analysis of international practice’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, mzaa092. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092en
dc.identifier.eissn1464-3677
dc.identifier.issn1353-4505
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal for Quality in Health Careen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/10553
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.rights© 2020, the Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in the International Journal for Quality in Health Care, following peer review. The version of record [Naughton, C., Meehan, E., Lehane, E., Landers, C., Flaherty, S. J, Lane, A., Landers, M., Kilty, C., Saab, M. M., Goodwin, J., Walshe, N., Wills, T., McCarthy, V., Murphy, S., McCarthy, J., Cummins, H., Madden, D. and Hegarty, J. (2020) ‘Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: An analysis of international practice’, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, mzaa092, doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092] is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092en
dc.subjectQuality improvementen
dc.subjectClinical auditen
dc.subjectEthicsen
dc.subjectConsenten
dc.subjectPersonal health dataen
dc.titleEthical frameworks for quality improvement activities: An analysis of international practiceen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13676.pdf
Size:
651.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Nursing and Midwifery - Journal Articles
Law - Journal Articles