The limits of proprietary estoppel: Thorner v Major

dc.contributor.authorMee, John
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-07T11:46:56Z
dc.date.available2024-03-02T17:46:24Zen
dc.date.available2024-03-07T11:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2009en
dc.date.updated2024-03-02T17:46:25Zen
dc.description.abstractConsiders the House of Lords decision in Thorner v Major, reported as Thorner v Curtis, on whether a farmer who had worked without pay on his cousin's farm because of vague assurances that he would inherit the farm, had a claim in proprietary estoppel when the cousin died intestate. Discusses how the reasoning in the instant case differed from the earlier House of Lords decision in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd, the importance of certainty of representation and of the subject matter of the representation and the relationship between proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts.
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Version
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMee, J. (2009) 'The limits of proprietary estoppel', Child and Family Law Quarterly, 21(3), pp. 367-383.
dc.identifier.eissn1742-6618
dc.identifier.endpage383
dc.identifier.issued3
dc.identifier.journaltitleChild and Family Law Quarterly
dc.identifier.startpage367
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/15635
dc.identifier.volume21
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJordan Publishing
dc.rights© 2009, Jordan Publishing. Reproduced by permission of RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis. This accepted version is made available under a CC-BY-NC licence.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectConstructive trustsen
dc.subjectFarms
dc.subjectIntestacy
dc.subjectProprietary estoppel
dc.titleThe limits of proprietary estoppel: Thorner v Major
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LimitsofEstoppelCORA.pdf
Size:
259.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version