A critical realist investigation of collaborative research proposals in Information Systems: towards a guiding deliberation canvas

Simple item page
dc.availability.bitstreamcontrolled
dc.check.chapterOfThesisAll of section 9.en
dc.check.date2027-10-31
dc.contributor.advisorAdam, Fredericen
dc.contributor.advisorMurphy, Ciaranen
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, James B.
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-28T09:25:58Z
dc.date.available2022-09-28T09:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.submitted2021
dc.description.abstractThis study is focused on the information flows, communication mechanisms, and review processes that take place around the proposal phase of a research project. The study included a survey plus six focus groups with the research offices of five universities plus one large research institute. Two of these universities are based in Ireland, two in the UK, plus one in Belgium. All universities are deemed as research intensive universities. This study employs a critical realist approach based on the exploration of the literature, the survey data, and insights from the focus groups. The critical realist approach used in this study is an example of how critical realism can be applied to a mixed methods project that includes an empirical study allied to feedback from focus groups. Important findings from the survey suggested that the perceived lack of time to be the biggest barrier for researchers to engage in research proposal development. This was followed by the challenges of internal administration and bureaucracy when getting involved in research projects. The next biggest challenge was the lack of knowledge and skills which prevented their engagement with interesting research calls or topics. One finding of the empirical study suggested that researchers are more concerned with winning funding for their research project first, with research and science as a secondary motivator. The study also produced the Stages, Phases, and Gates During Scientific Collaboration model (SPG) which builds a more comprehensive process view of the research lifecycle. This model contributes to the existing body of knowledge by combining stage-gate concepts to match the rule driven environment in use by research offices in universities, major collaborative funding bodies, and industry partners. Additional contributions include the development of the Research Deliberation Canvas (RDC) which promotes a more inclusive and structured approach to the early stages of a research proposal as well as promoting a more intrusive and engaging approach to reviews of the proposal with the PI, research collaborators, and especially the research office of the university. The inclusion of difficult questions regarding the strength and suitability of the proposal raise the touchy question whether it is advisable to continue with the effort if there is little chance of success. The focus groups suggested that utilising a canvas approach in the review process could facilitate the development and sharing of best practises within the research office and with researchers. Furthermore, it was suggested that there was potential benefit to leveraging the RDC as a training aid for academics new to research.en
dc.description.statusNot peer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMcCarthy, J. B. 2021. A critical realist investigation of collaborative research proposals in Information Systems: towards a guiding deliberation canvas. PhD Thesis, University College Cork.en
dc.identifier.endpage344en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/13682
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity College Corken
dc.rights© 2021, James Bernard McCarthy.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectRDCen
dc.subjectSPGen
dc.subjectCRen
dc.subjectResearch deliberation canvasen
dc.subjectStages, phases, and gates during scientific collaborationen
dc.subjectResearch proposalen
dc.subjectProposal reviewen
dc.subjectPre-fundingen
dc.subjectResearch lifecycleen
dc.subjectResearch process stagesen
dc.subjectCritical realismen
dc.subjectMixed methodsen
dc.subjectResearch barriersen
dc.subjectResearch enablersen
dc.subjectResearch driversen
dc.subjectCritical realisten
dc.titleA critical realist investigation of collaborative research proposals in Information Systems: towards a guiding deliberation canvasen
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD - Doctor of Philosophyen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Thumbnail Image
Name:
83007041 James Bernard McCarthy.docx
Size:
7.69 MB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Full Text E-thesis (Word)
Thumbnail Image
Name:
83007041 James Bernard McCarthy.pdf
Size:
4.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full Text E-thesis
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3. James Bernard McCarthy - 83007041 - Submission for examination form.pdf
Size:
613.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Submission for Examination Form
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McCarthyJB_PhD2021_Partial.pdf.pdf
Size:
3.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Partial Restriction
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Theses
Business Information Systems - Doctoral Theses
College of Business and Law - Doctoral Theses
Financial Services Innovation Centre - Doctoral Theses