Two fallacies in comparisons between humans and non-humans

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorRoss, Don
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-20T06:09:03Z
dc.date.available2019-11-20T06:09:03Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe hypothesis that humans are superior to non-humans by virtue of higher cognitive powers is often supported by two recurrent fallacies: (1) that any competence shown by humans but not by our closest living relatives (apes) must be unique to humans; and (2) that grades of intelligence can be inferred from behavior without regard to motivational structures.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid13en
dc.identifier.citationRoss, D., 2018. Two fallacies in comparisons between humans and non-humans. Animal Sentience, 3(23), (13).en
dc.identifier.endpage3en
dc.identifier.issn2377-7478
dc.identifier.issued23en
dc.identifier.journaltitleAnimal Sentienceen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/9162
dc.identifier.volume3en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherHumane Society Institute for Science and Policy (HSISP)en
dc.relation.urihttps://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/vol3/iss23/13/
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2018en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectHuman cultural traditionsen
dc.subjectHuman behaviouren
dc.subjectNon-humanen
dc.subjectSuperiorityen
dc.subjectCognition and perceptionen
dc.titleTwo fallacies in comparisons between humans and non-humansen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Two fallacies in comparisons between humans and non-humans.pdf
Size:
177.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Philosophy - Journal Articles