The effectiveness of working wrist splints in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A mixed methods systematic review
Loading...
Files
Published version
Date
2014-04-01
Authors
Ramsey, Lucia
Winder, Robert John
McVeigh, Joseph G.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Medical Journals Sweden
Published Version
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of working wrist splints in people with rheumatoid arthritis. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Ten databases were searched from inception until September 2012 for quantitative and qualitative studies on the effectiveness of working wrist splints in rheumatoid arthritis. DATA EXTRACTION: Data was extracted on participants, interventions, outcome measures and results. Experimental studies were evaluated using the van Tulder scale and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Data was extracted by a single reviewer and all studies were reviewed by two blind reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-three studies were included in the review (n = 1,492), 13 experimental studies including 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 2 qualitative studies. Data was summarized using best evidence synthesis and a meta-ethnographical approach guided qualitative evidence synthesis. There is strong quantitative evidence (including 9 RCTs), supported by conclusions from qualitative literature, that working wrist splints reduce pain (d = 0.7-0.8), moderate evidence that grip strength is improved (d = 0.3-0.4) and dexterity impaired and insufficient evidence of their effect on function. CONCLUSIONS: Working wrist splints reduce pain and improve grip in rheumatoid arthritis. The effect of splints on function is not yet clear.
Description
Keywords
Working wrist splint , Rheumatoid arthritis , Mixed methods systematic review
Citation
Ramsey, L., Winder, R. and McVeigh, J. (2014) ‘The effectiveness of working wrist splints in adults with rheumatoid arthritis: A mixed methods systematic review’, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46(6), pp. 481–492. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1804
Link to publisher’s version
Collections
Copyright
© 2014 The Authors. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1804; J Rehabil Med 46 Journal Compilation © 2014 Foundation of Rehabilitation Information