Incomplete but useful? Professional responses to cost-containment constructs

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMalmi, Teemu
dc.contributor.authorDerichs, David
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-07T09:25:58Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T10:32:39Z
dc.date.available2026-01-07T09:25:58Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAdopting an institutional logics lens, this study examines how different professional groups interpret and respond to incompleteness during the development of an accounting construct in a U.S. teaching hospital. Using an interventionist research design, we co-developed the construct by integrating financial and clinical data to identify and reduce unwarranted cost variations. Drawing on 28 interviews conducted in winter 2018 and spring 2023, alongside field observations, our findings reveal distinct professional responses. Frontline clinicians recognized the construct's incompleteness but saw value in it as a discussion aid. Guided by a hybrid logic of professional autonomy and patient-centered care, they adopted a reflexive change response, selectively using the construct to enhance decision-making. Hospital managers, operating within a segmentation logic of performance and compliance, viewed incompleteness as a manageable limitation. Their pragmatic negotiation response balanced internal support for the construct with external reporting requirements. Clinician-managers, positioned between clinical and managerial logics, experienced tension when the construct failed to satisfy either. Reflecting a dominance logic where clinical concerns prevailed, they ultimately adopted an active resistance response. We contribute to accounting research by demonstrating how institutional logics shape the performative effects of accounting incompleteness. Although incompleteness is widely recognized as socially constructed and interpretively flexible, our study explains why professionals respond to the same incomplete construct in different ways. We show that institutional logics influence the performative capacity of accounting constructs by shaping how professionals interpret and respond to perceived incompleteness—either enabling uptake, redefining purpose, or undermining legitimacy—depending on how that incompleteness aligns with or challenges dominant logics.en
dc.description.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMalmi, T., Derichs, D. and Carr, M. (2025) 'Incomplete but useful? Professional responses to cost‐containment constructs', Financial Accountability & Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.70021en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/faam.70021
dc.identifier.issn2674424
dc.identifier.journaltitleFinancial Accountability and Managementen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/18383
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Incen
dc.rights© 2025, the Author(s). Financial Accountability & Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original workis properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAccounting incompletenessen
dc.subjectCost managementen
dc.subjectHealthcare accountingen
dc.subjectInstitutional logicsen
dc.subjectInterventionist researchen
dc.titleIncomplete but useful? Professional responses to cost-containment constructsen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Financ Acc Manag - 2025 - Malmi - Incomplete but Useful Professional Responses to Cost‐Containment Constructs.pdf
Size:
620.87 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Download
Collections
Cork University Business School - Journal Articles