The use of atraumatic restorative treatment in elderly patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial

Simple item page
dc.check.date10000-01-01
dc.check.embargoformatE-thesis on CORA onlyen
dc.check.entireThesisEntire Thesis Restricted
dc.check.infoIndefiniteen
dc.check.opt-outYesen
dc.check.reasonThis thesis is due for publication or the author is actively seeking to publish this materialen
dc.contributor.advisorO'Mahony, Denisen
dc.contributor.advisorAllen, P. Finbarren
dc.contributor.authorda Mata, Cristiane
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Boarden
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-03T16:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.submitted2013
dc.description.abstractObjectives: to assess elderly patients’ dental status and dental habits and compare the survival rates, impact on patients’ quality of life and cost-effectiveness of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) and a conventional treatment (CT) to restore carious lesions in an elderly population. Methods: In this randomised clinical trial, 99 independently living adults (65-90 yrs) with carious lesions were randomly allocated to receive either ART or CT. Details of restored, missing and carious teeth were recorded and patients answered some questions about their oral hygiene and dental attendance habits. Direct and indirect costs were measured based on treatment time, materials and labour. Effectiveness was measured using restoration survival percentage after one year. The survival of restorations was assessed 6 months and one year after restoration placement by an independent examiner. Oralhealth related quality of life (OHRQoL) was assessed using the OHIP-14 at baseline and 2 months after treatment together with a global transition statement. Results: The patient sample comprised 46 (46.46%) male and 53 (53.54) female participants at baseline, with a mean age of 73.18 (SD=6.76). The mean DMFT of the entire sample was 27.10. Ninety patients and 268 restorations could be assessed after one year, 127 ART (46 patients) and 141 conventional restorations (44 patients). 93.7% and 97.2% of the restorations placed were considered successful in the ART and CT groups, respectively. The OHIP scores did not change dramatically 2 months after treatment, in either group. The global transition scale showed an improvement in overall oral health after treatment for the majority of patients. The ART were more cost-effective compared to the CT restorations. Conclusions: ART presented survival rates similar to CT after 1 year and was a more cost-effective alternative to treat the elderly.en
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth Research Board (HRAPOR/2010/154)en
dc.description.statusNot peer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Version
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMendonca da Mata, C. 2013. The use of atraumatic restorative treatment in elderly patients: a randomised controlled clinical trial. PhD Thesis, University College Cork.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/1358
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity College Corken
dc.rights© 2013, Cristiane Mendonca da Mata.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en
dc.subjectGerodontologyen
dc.subjectHealth economicsen
dc.subjectDental cariesen
dc.subjectAtraumatic restorative treatmenten
dc.subject.lcshOlder people--Dental careen
dc.thesis.opt-outtrue
dc.titleThe use of atraumatic restorative treatment in elderly patients: a randomised controlled clinical trialen
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD (Dentistry)en
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.62 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Decision to Withhold Autumn 2013 Cristiane Mendonca da Mata.pdf
Size:
28.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Opt-out
Download
Collections
Doctoral Theses
College of Medicine and Health - Doctoral Theses
Cork University Dental School and Hospital - Doctoral Theses