Scholarly equivalents of the monograph? An examination of some digital edge cases
| dc.contributor.author | O'Sullivan, James | |
| dc.contributor.funder | Arts and Humanities Research Council | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-26T15:50:56Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-07-26T15:50:56Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-06 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2017-07-24T23:21:08Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | This brief report was completed as part of the AHRC-funded Academic Book of the Future project. The purpose of this report is to query whether born digital "edge cases" can be considered to be the scholarly quivalent of the academic book. For a list of all reports and resources generated by the project, see: https://academicbookfuture.org/links-and-resources/ | en |
| dc.description.status | Not peer reviewed | en |
| dc.description.uri | https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/project-report_academic-book-of-the-future_deegan3.pdf | en |
| dc.description.version | Accepted Version | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | James O'Sullivan (2017) 'Scholarly Equivalents of the Monograph? An Examination of some Digital Edge Cases', part of The Academic Book of the Future (AHRC-funded project) | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/4273 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | The Academic Book of the Future Project | en |
| dc.relation.uri | https://academicbookfuture.org/end-of-project-reports-2/ | |
| dc.rights | © 2017 The Author; Part of The Academic Book of the Future Project Report (AHRC) | en |
| dc.subject | Academic publishing | en |
| dc.subject | Digital publishing | en |
| dc.subject | Digital humanities | en |
| dc.title | Scholarly equivalents of the monograph? An examination of some digital edge cases | en |
| dc.type | Report | en |
