A four-cycle model of IS design science research: capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design
dc.contributor.author | Drechsler, Andreas | |
dc.contributor.author | Hevner, Alan | |
dc.contributor.editor | Parsons, Jeffrey | |
dc.contributor.editor | Tuunanen, Tuure | |
dc.contributor.editor | Venable, John R. | |
dc.contributor.editor | Helfert, Markus | |
dc.contributor.editor | Donnellan, Brian | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kenneally, Jim | |
dc.contributor.funder | National University of Ireland, Maynooth | en |
dc.contributor.funder | Claremont Graduate University, United States | en |
dc.contributor.funder | Memorial University of Newfoundland, Canada | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-05-16T09:24:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-05-16T09:24:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | We propose to extend the well-known three-cycle view for design science research (DSR) with a fourth cycle (change and impact cycle) that captures the dynamic nature of IS artifact design for volatile environments. The appropriation of in-innovative designs results in organizational changes that happen outside the new artifacts' immediate application contexts. The intention behind introducing the fourth cycle is to integrate recent advances in the DSR discourse conceptually within the DSR cycle model. We critically review such recent advances and integrate them into an extended model. We show how this change and impact (CI) cycle adds an important facet to DSR to cope with dynamic application contexts as well as artifact-induced organizational change and the resulting need for follow-up design efforts. Iterations of the CI cycle represent the continuous design evolution required to keep up with changing organizational environments. | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Published Version | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Drechsler, A. & Hevner, A. 2016. A four-cycle model of IS design science research: capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design. In: Parsons, J., Tuunanen, T., Venable, J. R., Helfert, M., Donnellan, B., & Kenneally, J. (eds.) Breakthroughs and Emerging Insights from Ongoing Design Science Projects: Research-in-progress papers and poster presentations from the 11th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST) 2016. St. John, Canada, 23-25 May. pp. 1-8 | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 8 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-906642-85-3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/2560 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | DESRIST 2016 | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Breakthroughs and Emerging Insights from Ongoing Design Science Projects: Research-in-progress papers and poster presentations from the 11th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology (DESRIST) 2016. St. John, Canada, 23-25 May | |
dc.relation.uri | https://desrist2016.wordpress.com/ | |
dc.rights | ©2016, The Author(s). | en |
dc.subject | Design science research | en |
dc.subject | DSR cycle model | en |
dc.subject | Rigor cycle | en |
dc.subject | Relevance cycle | en |
dc.subject | Design cycle | en |
dc.subject | Change and impact cycle | en |
dc.title | A four-cycle model of IS design science research: capturing the dynamic nature of IS artifact design | en |
dc.type | Conference item | en |