Comparison between local anaesthetic agents, lidocaine and bupivacaine, in patients undergoing third molar extraction in terms of patient satisfaction.
dc.check.embargoformat | Not applicable | en |
dc.check.info | No embargo required | en |
dc.check.opt-out | Not applicable | en |
dc.check.reason | No embargo required | en |
dc.check.type | No Embargo Required | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Sleeman, Duncan | en |
dc.contributor.author | McCarthy, Caroline | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-01T16:15:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-01T16:15:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | AIMS: (1) To determine if anaesthetic agent bupivacaine, has a prolonged effect on the period of acute postoperative pain when compared to lidocaine, a shorter acting agent. (2) To determine patient’s post-operative satisfaction and preference with regard to anaesthetic choice. METHODS: This double blind, randomised, interventional clinical trial included 85 patients. All patients had bilateral impacted lower third molars of removed under general anaesthetic. All patients received 0.5% plain bupivacaine on one randomly allocated side, with 2% lidocaine (with adrenaline) administered on the opposite side. Pain was measured using visual analogue scales at 0, 30, 60 minutes and 3, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-surgery. Pain was analysed for 1 week following surgery. Psychological evaluations and patient reported outcomes, including patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: A significant difference in pain (P=0.001) was seen during the 3-8 hour post-operative period. The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval was 10.0 or above at 3hours and 4 hours post-surgery. Two-thirds of patients preferred bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: Longer lasting anaesthetics such as bupivacaine offer a longer period of analgesia, and improve overall patient satisfaction. | en |
dc.description.status | Not peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Accepted Version | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | McCarthy, C. 2016. Comparison between local anaesthetic agents, lidocaine and bupivacaine, in patients undergoing third molar extraction in terms of patient satisfaction. DClinDent Thesis, University College Cork. | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 93 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/2235 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | University College Cork | en |
dc.rights | © 2016, Caroline McCarthy. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Third molar | en |
dc.subject | Patient satisfaction | en |
dc.subject | Lidocaine | en |
dc.subject | Bupivacaine | en |
dc.subject | Split- mouth | en |
dc.thesis.opt-out | false | |
dc.title | Comparison between local anaesthetic agents, lidocaine and bupivacaine, in patients undergoing third molar extraction in terms of patient satisfaction. | en |
dc.type | Doctoral thesis | en |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Clinical Dentistry | en |
ucc.workflow.supervisor | d.sleeman@ucc.ie |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
- Name:
- Thesis- PDF.pdf
- Size:
- 1.81 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Full Text E-thesis
Loading...
- Name:
- Abstract thesis submission.docx
- Size:
- 13.67 KB
- Format:
- Microsoft Word XML
- Description:
- Abstract
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 5.62 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: