Associating on familiar grounds: a habitual perspective on the freedom of association

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMartens, Judith H.en
dc.contributor.editorCahill, Maria
dc.contributor.editorÓ Conaill, Seán
dc.contributor.editorNewman, Dwight
dc.contributor.editorMcIntyre, Ruairí
dc.contributor.editorLasagni, Giulia
dc.contributor.editorKhasri, Aoif
dc.contributor.funderIrish Research Councilen
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T14:45:07Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T14:45:07Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-01en
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter, I will introduce the idea of habits, familiarity, and proxy-reasons as important underpinnings of our associational life. I will use my analysis to examine the moot court scenario of Cairde ar son Cairdre Soup Kitchen (presented in the introduction of this book). To gain insight into the framework, I will begin by outlining the results of applying my approach to the moot scenario. In this scenario, Cairde ar son Cairdre is an outdoor soup kitchen initiated by a group of friends. Over time, several shops become involved, and the outreach goes beyond offering a shared meal to those in need. The group views their activities as an expression of community support that transcends formal legal structure. The group of friends wants to maintain an unofficial status and informal character, partly because they aim for an atmosphere that is open and friendly to their guests. The volunteers at Cairde ar son Cairdre, led by Gráinne, formed an association through their shared values and collective actions. To its members, this association is not a legal or formal agreement, but an expression of shared identity and commitment to a social cause. This is even though they clearly commit to a structural way of organising regular activities and have clear role divisions. The Charity Regulators want the soup kitchen to register as a charity and act in accordance with the Charities Act. They ask the soup kitchen to conform to formal registration and financial oversight. The group objects to this formalisation based on their right to freedom of association. How can my conceptual work on habits, familiarity, and proxy-reasons help the legal and ethical discourse surrounding the freedom of expression and association? I will argue that my framework allows us to see how the proxy-reasons (a proxy or interim for reasons) offered by the sense of familiarity gives meaning to the actions of the soup kitchen. Their informal familiarity-based structure is both meaningful and essential.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMartens, J. H. (2025) 'Associating on familiar grounds: a habitual perspective on the freedom of association', Societās Working Paper 32/2025 (18pp). Cork: School of Law, University College Cork.en
dc.identifier.endpage18en
dc.identifier.issued32
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/17844
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSchool of Law, University College Corken
dc.relation.ispartofSocietās: Exploring the Value of Freedom of Association
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal Perspectives on Freedom of Association Collection
dc.relation.ispartofSocietās Working Paper Series
dc.rights© 2025, the Author(s). Views expressed do not represent the views of the Societās project or the School of Law at UCC.en
dc.subjectFreedom of associationen
dc.subjectHabitsen
dc.subjectFamiliarityen
dc.subject~Law - Societās Working Paper Series~en
dc.titleAssociating on familiar grounds: a habitual perspective on the freedom of associationen
dc.typeWorking paperen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Societas WP32_Habitual Perspective_Judith Martens.pdf
Size:
440.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Download
Collections
School of Law