Action design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design science
dc.contributor.author | Maccani, Giovanni | |
dc.contributor.author | Donnellan, Brian | |
dc.contributor.author | Helfert, Markus | |
dc.contributor.editor | Donnellan, Brian | |
dc.contributor.editor | Gleasure, Rob | |
dc.contributor.editor | Helfert, Markus | |
dc.contributor.editor | Kenneally, Jim | |
dc.contributor.editor | Rothenberger, Marcus | |
dc.contributor.editor | Chiarini Tremblay, Monica | |
dc.contributor.editor | VanderMeer, Debra | |
dc.contributor.editor | Winter, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-13T15:08:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-13T15:08:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | |
dc.description.abstract | This research in progress paper addresses the IS issue in relation to conducting relevant research while keeping academic rigor. In particular, it contributes to the ongoing academic conversation around the investigation on how to incor-porate action in design science research. In this document the philosophical underpinnings of the recently proposed methodology called Action Design Re-search [1] are derived, outlined and integrated into Burrel and Morgan’s Par-adigmatic Framework (1979)[6]. The results so far show how Action Design Research can be considered as a particular case of Design Science Research (rather than a methodology closely related to Action Research) although they can assume two different epistemological positions. From these philosophical perspectives, future works will involve the inclusion of actual research projects using the three different methodologies. The final goal is to outline and structure the divergences and similarities of Action Design Research with Design Science Research and Canonical Action Research. | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Published Version | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | MACCANI, G., DONNELLAN, B., HELFERT, M. 2015. Action design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design science. In: DONNELLAN, B., GLEASURE, R., HELFERT, M., KENNEALLY, J., ROTHENBERGER, M., CHIARINI TREMBLAY, M., VANDERMEER, D. & WINTER, R. (eds.) At the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May. pp. 69-76. | en |
dc.identifier.endpage | 76 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-910097-80-9 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 69 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/1809 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | DESRIST 2015 | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | At the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May. | |
dc.relation.uri | http://desrist2015.computing.dcu.ie/ | |
dc.rights | ©2015, The Author(s). | en |
dc.subject | Action design research | en |
dc.subject | Paradigmatic framework | en |
dc.subject | Design science | en |
dc.subject | Canonical action research | en |
dc.title | Action design research: a comparison with canonical action research and design science | en |
dc.type | Conference item | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 10-100_DESRIST2015_Action Design Research.pdf
- Size:
- 125.98 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Published Version
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: