User preferences for the design of wearable technology systems - a scoping review: 194

dc.contributor.authorO'Riordan, Clíona
dc.contributor.authorKenny, Lorna
dc.contributor.authorTedesco, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorSica, Marco
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Colum
dc.contributor.authorBarton, John
dc.contributor.authorTimmons, Suzanne
dc.contributor.authorO'Flynn, Brendan
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T14:31:55Z
dc.date.available2020-08-13T14:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-16
dc.date.updated2020-08-13T14:23:23Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Wearable technology is a fast developing area. Often, the focus of research is on accuracy, while the practicalities of using the device may be overlooked, despite the fact that this greatly influences utility. This scoping review therefore explored the design and usability preferences of people for wearable technology for health monitoring. Methods: A scoping review was conducted of literature evaluating user preferences for the design of wearable technology systems, for people aged >50 years, with good health, or chronic diseases. Results: A search of relevant databases yielded 628 potential studies (after duplicates removed). Following title/abstract and then full text screening, 17 papers were included. The most commonly reported theme related to design and user interface (13 studies). Users wanted a small, unobtrusive and light device which doesn’t snag on clothing or affect activities of daily living, but yet has a readable and easy-to-use interface, which may prove challenging for designers! Users were most happy to wear a device on the wrist and/or hip region, being considered the least obtrusive / most discrete. Users were open to the technology aspects of the device, but wanted specific training, or clear and readable instructions. Less commonly reported parameters included issues with privacy and ownership of data (two studies); cost (two studies); reliability and accuracy (three studies), including being accurate overnight and in the shower, etc.; and clinical usefulness, i.e. the data being effectively linked with other healthcare data. Where considered, participants didn’t want to wear a device by night (two studies). Safety of wearable devices was not a theme in any study. Conclusion: Overall, user needs seem to be rarely considered in the design of wearable technology for health monitoring. However, the limited studies do highlight important user concerns, which should be considered by the technology designers and prescribers.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationO'Riordan, C., Kenny, L., Tedesco, S., Sica, M., Crowe, C., Barton, J., Timmons, S. and O'Flynn, B. (2019) 'User Preferences for the Design of Wearable Technology Systems - A Scoping Review: 194', Age and Ageing, 48(Supplement_3), pp. iii17-iii65. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz103.115en
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ageing/afz103.115en
dc.identifier.issn0002-0729
dc.identifier.issuedSupplement_3en
dc.identifier.journaltitleAge and Ageingen
dc.identifier.startpageiii17en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/10390
dc.identifier.volume48en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.urihttps://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/48/Supplement_3/iii17/5570422
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.comen
dc.subjectActivities of daily livingen
dc.subjectChronic diseaseen
dc.subjectClothingen
dc.subjectHappinessen
dc.subjectHip regionen
dc.subjectOwnershipen
dc.subjectPersonal satisfactionen
dc.subjectPrivacyen
dc.subjectSafetyen
dc.subjectUser-computer interfaceen
dc.subjectWristen
dc.subjectMedical devicesen
dc.subjectWearable electronic devicesen
dc.titleUser preferences for the design of wearable technology systems - a scoping review: 194en
dc.typeConference itemen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
afz103.115.pdf
Size:
66.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: