Biased group decision-making and the effect of computer-mediated communication: separating the effects of anonymity, voting and blind picking

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLamprecht, Jens
dc.contributor.authorRobra-Bissantz, Susanne
dc.contributor.editorDonnellan, Brian
dc.contributor.editorGleasure, Rob
dc.contributor.editorHelfert, Markus
dc.contributor.editorKenneally, Jim
dc.contributor.editorRothenberger, Marcus
dc.contributor.editorChiarini Tremblay, Monica
dc.contributor.editorVanderMeer, Debra
dc.contributor.editorWinter, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-12T13:52:49Z
dc.date.available2015-05-12T13:52:49Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.description.abstractThe influence of communication technology on group decision-making has been examined in many studies. But the findings are inconsistent. Some studies showed a positive effect on decision quality, other studies have shown that communication technology makes the decision even worse. One possible explanation for these different findings could be the use of different Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS) in these studies, with some GDSS better fitting to the given task than others and with different sets of functions. This paper outlines an approach with an information system solely designed to examine the effect of (1) anonymity, (2) voting and (3) blind picking on decision quality, discussion quality and perceived quality of information.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationLAMPRECHT J. & ROBRA-BISSANTZ, S. 2015. Biased group decision-making and the effect of computer-mediated communication: separating the effects of anonymity, voting and blind picking. In: DONNELLAN, B., GLEASURE, R., HELFERT, M., KENNEALLY, J., ROTHENBERGER, M., CHIARINI TREMBLAY, M., VANDERMEER, D. & WINTER, R. (eds.) At the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May. pp. 41-46en
dc.identifier.endpage46en
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-910097-80-9
dc.identifier.startpage41en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/1802
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDESRIST 2015en
dc.relation.ispartofAt the Vanguard of Design Science: First Impressions and Early Findings from Ongoing Research Research-in-Progress Papers and Poster Presentations from the 10th International Conference, DESRIST 2015. Dublin, Ireland, 20-22 May.
dc.relation.urihttp://desrist2015.computing.dcu.ie/
dc.rights©2015, The Author(s).en
dc.subjectHidden profileen
dc.subjectGroup decision makingen
dc.subjectComputer-mediated communicationen
dc.subjectComputer supporten
dc.subjectInformation sharingen
dc.subjectDesign scienceen
dc.subjectAnonymityen
dc.subjectVotingen
dc.subjectBlind picken
dc.subjectSocial validationen
dc.subjectConformity pressureen
dc.subjectOwnership biasen
dc.titleBiased group decision-making and the effect of computer-mediated communication: separating the effects of anonymity, voting and blind pickingen
dc.typeConference itemen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
6-101_DESRIST.pdf
Size:
141.46 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
At the Vanguard of Design Science: DESRIST 2015 Research-in-Progress Proceedings