Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bicentre prospective cohort study
dc.check.date | 2010-03-29 | |
dc.check.info | Access to this article is restricted until 12 months after publication by request of the publisher. | en |
dc.contributor.author | van Zanten, F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Schraffordt Koops, S. E. | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Sullivan, Orfhlaith E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lenters, E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Broeders, I. A. M. J. | |
dc.contributor.author | O'Reilly, Barry A. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-08T14:35:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-08T14:35:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-29 | |
dc.date.updated | 2019-04-08T14:20:05Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: Robot‐assisted surgery is a recognized treatment for pelvic‐organ prolapse. Many of the surgical subgroup outcomes for apical prolapse are reported together leading to a paucity of homogenous data. Design: Prospective observational cohort study (https://clinicaltrials.gov; identifier NCT01598467) assessing outcomes for homogeneous subgroups of robot‐assisted apical prolapse surgery. Setting: Two European tertiary referral hospitals. Population: Consecutive patients undergoing robot‐assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) and supracervical hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy (RSHS). Methods: Anatomical cure (simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (sPOPQ) stage 1,), subjective cure (symptoms of bulge) and quality of life (Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire [PFIQ‐7]). Main Outcome measures: Primary outcome: anatomical and subjective cure. Secondary outcomes: surgical safety and intraoperative variables. Results: Total 305 patients included (RASC N=188, RSHS N=117). Twelve months follow‐up available for 144 (RASC 76.6%) and 109 (RSHS 93.2%). Anatomical success of the apical compartment occurred in 91% (RASC) and in 99% (RSHS). In all compartments, success percentages were 67% and 65% respectively. Most recurrences were anterior compartment (15.7% RASC [symptomatic 12.1%]; 22.9% RSHS [symptomatic 4.8%]). Symptoms of bulge improved from 97.4% to 17.4% (p<0.0005). PFIQ‐7 scores improved from 76.7 ± 62.3 to 13.5 ± 31.1 (p<0.0005). Duration of surgery increased significantly in RSHS (183.1 ± 38.2 versus 145.3 ± 29.8 [p<0.0005]). Intraoperative complications and conversion rates were low (RASC: 5.3% and 4.3%; RSHS: 0.0% and 0.0%). Four severe postoperative complications occurred after RASC (2.1%) and one after RSHS (1.6%). Conclusion: This is the largest reported prospective cohort study on robot‐assisted apical prolapse surgery. Both procedures are safe, with durable results. | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Accepted Version | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | van Zanten, F., Schraffordt Koops, S. E., O'Sullivan, O. E., Lenters, E., Broeders, I. A. M. J. and O'Reilly, B. A. (2019) 'Robot-assisted Surgery for the management of Apical Prolapse: A Bicentre Prospective Cohort Study', BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, In Press, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15696 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1471-0528.15696 | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1471-0528 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-0328 | |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/7726 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en |
dc.relation.uri | https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1471-0528.15696 | |
dc.rights | © 2019 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: van Zanten, F et al. (2019), Robot‐assisted Surgery for the management of Apical Prolapse: A Bicentre Prospective Cohort Study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. Accepted Author Manuscript.which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15696. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. | en |
dc.subject | Pelvic organ prolapse | en |
dc.subject | Sacral colpopexy | en |
dc.subject | Sacrocervicopexy | en |
dc.subject | Sacrocolpopexy | en |
dc.subject | Robot-assisted | en |
dc.title | Robot-assisted surgery for the management of apical prolapse: a bicentre prospective cohort study | en |
dc.type | Article (peer-reviewed) | en |