Regulatory quality of water pollution control: a comparative case study of India and China

Basu Roy, Sharanya

Restricted to everyone for five years. Restriction lift date: 2024-08-11T09:03:32Z

Regulatory quality of water pollution control: a comparative case study of India and China

dc.check.date	2024-08-11T09:03:32Z
dc.check.embargoformat	Apply the embargo to the e-thesis on CORA (If you have submitted an e-thesis and want to embargo it on CORA)	en
dc.check.entireThesis	Entire Thesis Restricted
dc.check.info	Restricted to everyone for five years	en
dc.check.opt-out	Not applicable	en
dc.check.reason	This thesis is due for publication or the author is actively seeking to publish this material	en
dc.contributor.advisor	McIntyre, Owen	en
dc.contributor.author	Basu Roy, Sharanya
dc.contributor.funder	Higher Education Authority	en
dc.contributor.funder	University College Cork	en
dc.date.accessioned	2019-08-13T09:03:32Z
dc.date.issued	2019
dc.date.submitted	2019
dc.description.abstract	Ecosystems constitute resource stocks that are regenerative but exhaustible when they are overused. To prevent ecosystems from collapsing, government intervention takes place through pollution control policies namely: regulation, effluent charges and subsidies, contract and redefinition of property rights and organisation. Of these four policy approaches, this study will concentrate on regulation. The management of water pollution has been challenging on multiple levels, particularly in developing countries like India and China, which risks undermining not only the economic growth of these countries but also the health and quality of life of billions of people. Therefore, an econometric analysis has been conducted in this study in order to examine the effect of strategic regulatory measures in both these countries. In addition, a comparative analysis of the regulatory measures of India and China has been done which would assist in identifying and quantifying the impact and shortcomings of pollution control policies in these two countries. The rest of the thesis is structured as follows: Chapter 1 is the introductory chapter which presents the motivation for this research and the rationale behind the development of this thesis. Chapter 2 outlines the analytical and theoretical methodology used in this thesis. Chapter 3 examines the effectiveness of regulatory measures for river pollution at the micro-level in India under the Ganga Action Plan (GAP). The GAP is India’s first river action plan (launched in three phases) which focuses on the country’s national river, the Ganges. The results indicate that the GAP has a weak legal basis. In addition, the institutions established under the GAP are also suffering from institutional failure. However, India’s civil society organizations appear to contribute towards Ganges river pollution abatement. Chapter 4 conducts a country level analysis for understanding river pollution regulatory measures in India. The results demonstrate that, at the macro-level, India’s regulatory measures are only slightly effective. Although India’s water law suffers from many legislative gaps, the low effectiveness of the regulatory measures could be due to the country’s judiciary which acts as an educator for polluting industries and encourages legal activism. A free media has contributed towards a rise in legal activism, as well. Institutions suffer from implementation failure at the macro level in India. Moreover, the civil society organisations fail to contribute towards river pollution abatement at the national level. Chapter 5 studies the effectiveness of river pollution regulatory measures in China. The results show that environmental regulation suffers from many legislative gaps. Furthermore, the country also suffers from a weak institutional structure for river pollution abatement. The effectiveness of regulatory measures are further weakened by corruption and restrictive media. Chapter 6 conducts a comparative analysis of India and China. The analysis demonstrates that China has a comparatively better legislative framework for river pollution abatement as compared to India, at least in terms of establishing river basin commissions (RBCs). Nonetheless, the former still fails to improve river water quality because of substantive legislative gaps. On the other hand, India, despite having poorer water legislation specifically aimed at river pollution, has still managed to reduce pollution levels, largely due to a better judiciary. The country’s judiciary has often stepped in to make-up for the Executive’s inefficiencies in the context of water pollution management. Both countries suffer from institutional failure of the Executive in terms of implementing river pollution abatement measures. Chapter 7 is the concluding chapter which summarises the key findings of this study. It also suggests a few policy recommendations.	en
dc.description.status	Not peer reviewed	en
dc.description.version	Accepted Version
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.identifier.citation	Basu Roy, S. 2019. Regulatory quality of water pollution control: a comparative case study of India and China. PhD Thesis, University College Cork.	en
dc.identifier.endpage	297	en
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/10468/8309
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	University College Cork	en
dc.relation.project	University College Cork (School of Law)	en
dc.rights	© 2019, Sharanya Basu Roy.	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/	en
dc.subject	Economic analysis of law	en
dc.subject	Water law and economics	en
dc.subject	Interdisciplinary	en
dc.subject	Regulatory quality	en
dc.subject	Econometrics	en
dc.subject	Public policy	en
dc.thesis.opt-out	false
dc.title	Regulatory quality of water pollution control: a comparative case study of India and China	en
dc.type	Doctoral thesis	en
dc.type.qualificationlevel	Doctoral	en
dc.type.qualificationname	PhD	en
ucc.workflow.supervisor	o.mcintyre@ucc.ie