Rethinking strategies for regulation of cross-border online gambling in the EU: an examination of legal and policy frameworks

Simple item page
dc.check.date9999-12-31
dc.contributor.advisorWhite, Fidelma
dc.contributor.authorLeahy, Deirdreen
dc.contributor.funderIrish Research Councilen
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-18T15:10:21Z
dc.date.available2025-02-18T15:10:21Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.date.submitted2024
dc.description.abstractWhen is an activity a ‘gambling’ activity? This question troubles law, time and again. Gambling is not a static concept, and the internet has fuelled rapid changes in the delivery of gambling services as well as enabling creation of new gambling formats. A volatile gambling environment is nothing new, and despite ingenuity as to format, framework and structure, gambling has always been an activity of change. It tends to be pursued by law, which must find the vernacular and normative means to capture and control new gambling formats. Why should this question concern the EU? When the EU adopted its policy for online gambling in 2012, legislative competence for the gambling sector, both land-based and online, was left to the Member States. In the interim, with development of novel sui generis online gambling and near-gambling formats, new challenges are emerging for gambling law. One of these formats, the loot box, an in-game purchasing structure built on randomised game architecture, blurs traditional boundaries between gambling and games and is proving difficult to regulate. Some Member States have attempted to capture it within existing legal definitions of gambling, and the EU has been called on to act, but there is still a lack of clarity about the role of gambling law in the context of an EU intervention. This triggers many questions: How does gambling law define ‘gambling’? What is gambling law and what are its objectives? What is the ‘fit’ of gambling law with EU law? What are the rationales for conferral of legislative competence for online gambling as between the EU and its Member States? Is there some quality to gambling law that makes it exceptional in this context? What are the legal obstacles to harmonisation? What is the role of the principle of subsidiarity in this debate? These questions are the subject of this thesis, which takes the loot box phenomenon to examine interrelationships between gambling law and EU law. It explores the discipline of gambling law to investigate whether gambling/gaming convergence creates an environment where a conceptualised approach to the principle of subsidiarity in EU law and policy for online gambling can be developed. It undertakes this task by means of a dual enquiry: first it investigates gambling law to unpack its conceptual foundations and normative context, and then it considers these findings against EU legislative competence for the internal market. The objectives of gambling control are weighed against the goals and objectives of the internal market to explore gaps between EU market aims and the public interest rationales that motivate gambling law. This enquiry demonstrates an unmet need to unravel the normative complexity of gambling law as a precursor to EU policy formation affecting the sector. Lessons learned from EU law and policy for tobacco control are explored to understand how the EU can frame its meta-regulatory functions in issues that impact on personal choice, and the nature of the EU’s sectoral regulatory role. Recognising the function of the principle of subsidiarity, this thesis argues that the discipline of gambling law creates a rebuttable presumption in favour of Member State legislative competence for the sector and pleads for normative sensitivity in the debate on gambling/gaming convergence. It concludes that the solution for EU digital policy with impacts on Member State legislative competence for online gambling is to take a structured approach, acknowledging that the challenge is one of diagonal competences. This should accept that the path towards a solution must first respect the polycentric objectives of gambling law, from which the primacy of Member State legislative competence can also be inferred.en
dc.description.statusNot peer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationLeahy, D. 2024. Rethinking strategies for regulation of cross-border online gambling in the EU: an examination of legal and policy frameworks. PhD Thesis, University College Cork.
dc.identifier.endpage336
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/17065
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity College Corken
dc.relation.projectIrish Research Council (Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship - Grant ID GOIPG/2019/3849)
dc.rights© 2024, Deirdre Leahy.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectGambling law
dc.subjectOnline gambling
dc.subjectEU law
dc.subjectGambling/gaming convergence
dc.subjectLoot boxes
dc.subjectHarmonisation
dc.subjectPrinciple of subsidiarity
dc.titleRethinking strategies for regulation of cross-border online gambling in the EU: an examination of legal and policy frameworks
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen
dc.type.qualificationnamePhD - Doctor of Philosophyen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LeahyDC_PhD2024.pdf
Size:
3.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Full Text E-thesis
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LeahyDC_PhD2024_Submission for examination form.pdf
Size:
476.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
5.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Theses
College of Business and Law - Doctoral Theses
Law - Doctoral Theses