Restoring phronesis and practice: marketing's forgotten p's

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kavanagh, Donncha
dc.date.accessioned 2016-06-24T15:24:14Z
dc.date.available 2016-06-24T15:24:14Z
dc.date.issued 2014-01
dc.identifier.citation Kavanagh, D. (2014) 'Restoring phronesis and practice: marketing's forgotten p's', Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 6(3), pp. 331-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JHRM-02-2014-0006 en
dc.identifier.volume 6 en
dc.identifier.issued 3 en
dc.identifier.startpage 331 en
dc.identifier.endpage 350 en
dc.identifier.issn 1755-750X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10468/2781
dc.identifier.doi 10.1108/JHRM-02-2014-0006
dc.description.abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolution of marketing’s philosophical conversation over the past 120 years, focusing on the emergent meaning of the notion that marketing should become more “scientific”. Design/methodology/approach – This paper focuses on the US academic marketing literature, primarily journal articles and books published in the first half of the 20th century. Findings – The Aristotelian distinction between techné, epistemé and phronesis provides a rich basis for framing philosophical discussion in marketing, and should supplant the art-science debate and Anderson’s distinction between science1 and science2. Prior to 1959, the marketing journals provided a forum for phronesis, though this diminished as the academic marketing community largely abandoned the inductive, contextual approach in favour of a deductive, “scientific” methodology. The Ford Foundation played an important role in effecting this change. Practical implications – The paper highlights the importance of forums where practitioners can reflect on the ethical and social implications of their practices and then work to enhance these practices for the greater social good. Social implications – Questions the value of distinctions between marketing theorists and practitioners and the consequential focus of marketing journals. Originality/value – Advances the concept of phronesis in the marketing literature and distinguishes it from epistemé, which has dominated academic marketing discourse over the past 60 years. en
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited en
dc.rights © Emerald Group Publishing Limited en
dc.subject Marketing history en
dc.subject Ethics en
dc.subject Epistemology en
dc.subject Phronesis en
dc.subject Critical marketing en
dc.subject Critical history en
dc.title Restoring phronesis and practice: marketing's forgotten p's en
dc.type Article (peer-reviewed) en
dc.internal.authorcontactother Donncha Kavanagh, Management & Marketing, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. +353-21-490-3000 Email: d.kavanagh@ucc.ie en
dc.internal.availability Full text available en
dc.date.updated 2014-11-01T16:19:08Z
dc.description.version Accepted Version en
dc.internal.rssid 277098924
dc.description.status Peer reviewed en
dc.identifier.journaltitle Journal of Historical Research in Marketing en
dc.internal.copyrightchecked No !!CORA!! Yes en
dc.internal.licenseacceptance Yes en
dc.internal.IRISemailaddress donncha.kavanagh@ucd.ie en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement