JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
The submission of new items to CORA is currently unavailable due to a repository upgrade. For further information, please contact cora@ucc.ie. Thank you for your understanding.
Full text restriction information:Access to this article is restricted until 6 months after publication by request of the publisher.
Restriction lift date:2018-04-02
Citation:Gade, P., Galvin, M., O’Sullivan, J., Walsh, P. and Murphy, Ó. (2017) 'Reactions to Imagery Generated Using Computational Aesthetic Measures', Leonardo, 50(5), pp. 453-460. doi:10.1162/LEON_a_01348
This article examines whether textural generation system imagery evolved with computational aesthetic support can be judged as having aesthetic attributes, both when knowing and not knowing its true origin. Such a generation, depicting a digital landscape, is offered to two groups of participants to appraise. It is hypothesized that there will be no statistically significant difference between the groups on their appraisal of the image. Results from statistical analysis prove to be consistent with this hypothesis. A minority of participants, however, do exhibit significant differences in their perception of the image based on its means of production. This article explores and illustrates these differences.
This website uses cookies. By using this website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with the UCC Privacy and Cookies Statement. For more information about cookies and how you can disable them, visit our Privacy and Cookies statement