A holistic study on the effects of a rural flood detention basin: flood peaks, water quality and grass growth

Simple item page
dc.check.date2026-12-31
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Darraghen
dc.contributor.authorWeatherill, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorHenriques, Rossanaen
dc.contributor.authorQuishi, Xieen
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, Simonen
dc.contributor.funderDepartment of the Environment, Climate and Communicationsen
dc.contributor.funderOffice of Public worksen
dc.contributor.funderEnvironmental Protection Agencyen
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T15:03:52Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T15:03:52Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.description.abstractNature-based Solutions (NbS) are widely advocated to have multiple benefits, including in flood risk reduction, water quality improvement and ecosystem health. There are, however, few empirical studies quantifying such multi-functionality. Given the ongoing pressures of flooding and poor water quality within Europe, there is an urgent need for empirical evidence to assess the potential for NbS features to address these issues. We present the first empirical results on the impacts of a nature-based flood detention basin on peak flow attenuation, water quality and pasture health. The detention basin comprised a 1.5m high soil bund constructed within a field bordering a first order tributary on a farm in the south of Ireland. Over two years, peak flows were diverted from the stream channel to the detention basin via a constructed sluice during the rising limb of high discharge. Detained waters were returned slowly to the channel via drainage pipes. During this time hydrological and quality data were collected from upstream, downstream and within the detention basin during peak flow events and pasture sward growth and health within the detention basin was assessed. These data revealed marked peak flow attenuation by < 38%, except under conditions of prolonged rainfall. The detention basin sequestered suspended solids (Removal efficiency RE 5.35%; p < 0.05) and nitrate (RE 13.37%; p < 0.001), but was a source of soluble reactive (RE -95%; p < 0.001) and particulate phosphorus (RE -83%; p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant reduction in pasture biomass, but higher Chlorophyll a/b ratio of inundated plants indicated reduced photosynthetic efficiency (30.85%; p < 0.001). Whilst capable of reducing peak flows, the mixed results on water quality and pasture health show that the operation of NbS features is complex, and that multi-functionality is not an inherent facet of NbS.en
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of the Environment, Climate and Communications, Office of Public works (EPA Research Programme 2014-2020 (EPA 2018-W-LS-20))en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid123858en
dc.identifier.citationMurphy, D., Weatherill, J., Henriques, R., Quishi, X. and Harrison, S. (2025) ‘A holistic study on the effects of a rural flood detention basin: Flood peaks, water quality and grass growth’, Journal of Environmental Management, 373, p. 123858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123858en
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123858en
dc.identifier.eissn0301-4797en
dc.identifier.endpage18en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Environmental Managementen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/16863
dc.identifier.volume373en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2024, Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en
dc.subjectRural flood detention basinen
dc.subjectFlood peaksen
dc.subjectWater qualityen
dc.subjectGrass growthen
dc.titleA holistic study on the effects of a rural flood detention basin: flood peaks, water quality and grass growthen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Murphy et al. 2025_accepted.docx
Size:
6.25 MB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Accepted Version
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Murphy et al. 2025_accepted.pdf
Size:
1.47 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences - Journal Articles