A comparison of three methods for estimating vertical ground reaction forces in running

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKomaris, Dimitrios-Sokratis
dc.contributor.authorPerez-Valero, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Luke
dc.contributor.authorBarton, John
dc.contributor.authorHennesy, Liam
dc.contributor.authorO'Flynn, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorTedesco, Salvatore
dc.contributor.funderEnterprise Irelanden
dc.contributor.funderSetanta College, Irelanden
dc.contributor.funderEuropean Regional Development Funden
dc.contributor.funderScience Foundation Irelanden
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-12T11:30:50Z
dc.date.available2020-08-12T11:30:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.date.updated2020-08-12T10:58:03Z
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare different approaches for the estimation of biomechanical loads in running. A neural network, a biomechanical model, and a two-mass model were tested on the same data set. The predictions of the neural network were highly accurate for all considered running speeds (average RMSE, 0.11 BW). The biomechanical model returned statistically similar results (p=0.113, 0.14 BW), but with increasing RMS errors at high running speeds. Finally, the two-mass model estimates were independent of running speed, but were the least accurate (RMSE, 0.18 BW).en
dc.description.sponsorshipEnterprise Ireland and Setanta College (IP 2017 0606); Ireland's European Structural and Investment Programme 2014-2020; Science Foundation Ireland (under Grant number 12/RC/2289-P2 which is co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleid14en
dc.identifier.citationKomaris, D. S., Perez-Valero, E., Jordan, L., Barton, J., Hennesy, L., O'Flynn, B. and Tedesco, S. (2020) ‘A comparison of three methods for estimating vertical ground reaction forces in running’, 38th International Society of Biomechanics in Sport Conference Physical conference, 20-24 July, ISBS Proceedings Archive, 38 (1) Article 14. Available at: https://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol38/iss1/14en
dc.identifier.endpage51en
dc.identifier.journaltitleISBS Proceedings Archiveen
dc.identifier.startpage48en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/10387
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherNorth Michigan University, NMU Commonsen
dc.relation.urihttps://commons.nmu.edu/isbs/vol38/iss1/14
dc.rights© Published by NMU Commons, 2020en
dc.subjectArtificial neural networksen
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen
dc.subjectMotion analysisen
dc.subjectKinematicsen
dc.titleA comparison of three methods for estimating vertical ground reaction forces in runningen
dc.typeConference itemen
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A_COMPARISON_OF_THREE_METHODS_FOR_ESTIMATING_VERTICAL_GROUND_REAC.pdf
Size:
382.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Tyndall National Institute - Conference Items