How reliable is assessment of children’s sentence comprehension using a self-directed app? A comparison of supported versus independent use

dc.contributor.authorFrizelle, Paulineen
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Anaen
dc.contributor.authorBiancone, Triciaen
dc.contributor.authorCeroni, Annaen
dc.contributor.authorDahly, Darren L.en
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Paulen
dc.contributor.authorBishop, Dorothy V. M.en
dc.contributor.authorMcKean, Cristinaen
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Boarden
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-20T12:03:53Z
dc.date.available2023-09-20T12:03:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-14en
dc.description.abstractThis study reports on the feasibility of using the Test of Complex Syntax- Electronic (TECS-E), as a self-directed app, to measure sentence comprehension in children aged 4 to 5 ½ years old; how testing apps might be adapted for effective independent use; and agreement levels between face-to-face supported computerized and independent computerized testing with this cohort. A pilot phase was completed with 4 to 4;06-year-old children, to determine the appropriate functional app features required to facilitate independent test completion. Following the integration of identified features, children completed the app independently or with adult support (4–4;05 (n = 22) 4;06–4;11 months (n = 55) and 5 to 5;05 (n = 113)) and test re-test reliability was examined. Independent test completion posed problems for children under 5 years but for those over 5, TECS-E is a reliable method to assess children’s understanding of complex sentences, when used independentlyen
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth Research Board, Ireland (Lead Investigator award (ILP-POR-2019-003))en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationFrizelle, P., Buckley, A., Biancone, T., Ceroni, A., Dahly, D., Fletcher, P., Bishop, D.V.M. and Mckean, C. (2023) ‘How reliable is assessment of children’s sentence comprehension using a self-directed app? A comparison of supported versus independent use’, Journal of Child Language, (29 pp). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000545en
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/s0305000923000545en
dc.identifier.endpage29en
dc.identifier.issn0305-0009en
dc.identifier.issn1469-7602en
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Child Languageen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/15014
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000545en
dc.rights© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0en
dc.subjectComplex syntaxen
dc.subjectComprehensionen
dc.subjectOnline assessmenten
dc.subjectChildrenen
dc.titleHow reliable is assessment of children’s sentence comprehension using a self-directed app? A comparison of supported versus independent useen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
how-reliable-is-assessment-of-childrens-sentence.pdf
Size:
708.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
S0305000923000545sup001.tiff
Size:
21.97 MB
Format:
Tag Image File Format
Description:
Supplementary material 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
S0305000923000545sup002.docx
Size:
15.08 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplementary material 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
S0305000923000545sup003.docx
Size:
25.89 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
Description:
Supplementary material 3
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: