Access to this article is restricted until 24 months after publication by request of the publisher.. Restriction lift date: 2019-04-20
Capacity and contention-based joint routing and gateway selection for machine-type communications
| dc.check.date | 2019-04-20 | |
| dc.check.info | Access to this article is restricted until 24 months after publication by request of the publisher. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Farooq, Muhammad O. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sreenan, Cormac J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Brown, Kenneth N. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-15T14:53:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-11-15T14:53:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-04-20 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2017-11-15T13:44:24Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Typically, in machine-type communications (MTC) devices communicate with servers over the Internet. In a large-scale machine-to-machine area (M2M) network, the devices may not connect directly to the Internet due to radio transmission and energy limitations. Therefore, the devices collaborate wirelessly to relay their data to a gateway. A large-scale M2M area network may have multiple gateways, selecting a proper gateway for the devices can have immense impact on the networks performance. We present the channel capacity and contention-based joint routing and gateway selection methods for MTC. Based on channel capacity and contention, our methods select the best gateway on per-packet, per-flow, and per-node basis. We compare the methods performance with existing methods using simulation and test-bed experiments. We analyse the impact of the number of gateways, physical distribution of transmitters, control overhead, and duty-cycling on the performance of the gateway selection methods. Our results demonstrate that, in duty-cycled operations, the methods performance depends on control overhead and making a good trade-off between load imbalance to different gateways and a forwarding paths length. Otherwise only the latter impacts the methods performance. In general, our node-based best gateway selection method makes a better trade-off and exhibits lower control overhead, hence it demonstrates better performance. Moreover, our methods demonstrate better performance as compared to an existing state-of-the-art joint routing and gateway selection method. | en |
| dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
| dc.description.version | Accepted Version | en |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
| dc.identifier.citation | Farooq, M. O., Sreenan, C. J. and Brown, K. N. (2017) 'Capacity and contention-based joint routing and gateway selection for machine-type communications', Ad Hoc Networks, 62(Supplement C), pp. 35-49. doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.04.006 | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.adhoc.2017.04.006 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 49 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1570-8705 | |
| dc.identifier.issued | C | en |
| dc.identifier.journaltitle | Ad Hoc Networks | en |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 35 | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/5054 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 62 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | en |
| dc.rights | © 2017, Elsevier B.V. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en |
| dc.subject | Machine-type communications | en |
| dc.subject | Routing | en |
| dc.subject | Gateway selection | en |
| dc.subject | Channel capacity | en |
| dc.subject | Contention | en |
| dc.title | Capacity and contention-based joint routing and gateway selection for machine-type communications | en |
| dc.type | Article (peer-reviewed) | en |
