Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies

dc.contributor.authorMcAuliffe, G. A.
dc.contributor.authorTakahashi, T.
dc.contributor.authorMogensen, L.
dc.contributor.authorHermansen, J. E.
dc.contributor.authorSage, Colin
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Deborah V.
dc.contributor.authorLee, M. R. F.
dc.contributor.funderAgriculture and Horticulture Development Board
dc.contributor.funderUtrecht-Network
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T09:40:13Z
dc.date.available2017-10-18T09:40:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractProduction of pork, the most consumed meat globally, is estimated to emit 668 m tonnes CO2-eq of greenhouse gases each year. Amongst various production systems that comprise the pig industry, grainbased intensive production is widely regarded as the largest polluter of the environment, and thus it is imperative to develop alternative systems that can provide the right balance between sustainability and food security. Using an original dataset from the Republic of Ireland, this paper examines the life-cycle environmental impacts of representative pig farms operating under varying production efficiencies. For the baseline farm with an average production efficiency, global warming potential (GWP), acidifi- cation potential (AP) and eutrophication potential (EP) per kg carcass weight departing the slaughterhouse were estimated to be 3.5 kg CO2-eq, 43.8 g SO2-eq and 32.1 g PO4-eq, respectively. For herds with a higher production efficiency, a 9% improvement in feed conversion ratio was met by 6%, 15% and 12% decreases in GWP, EP, AP, respectively. Scenario and sensitivity analyses also revealed that (a) a switch to high-protein diets results in lower GWP and higher AP and EP, and (b) reducing transportation distances by sourcing domestically produced wheat and barley does not lower environmental impacts in any notable manner. To improve cross-study comparability of these findings, results based on an auxiliary functional unit, kg liveweight departing the farm gate, are also reported.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAgriculture and Horticulture Development Board (7795); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P01268X/1); Utrecht-Network (Young Researcher's Mobility Grant)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationMcAuliffe, G. A., Takahashi, T., Mogensen, L., Hermansen, J. E., Sage, C. L., Chapman, D. V. and Lee, M. R. F. (2017) 'Environmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficiencies', Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, pp. 1163-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.191en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.191
dc.identifier.endpage1173
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526
dc.identifier.issn1879-1786
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Cleaner Productionen
dc.identifier.startpage1163
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/4886
dc.identifier.volume165
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.urihttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652617316451
dc.rights© 2017, the Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectPig productionen
dc.subjectEnvironmental footprinten
dc.subjectLife cycle assessmenten
dc.subjectFeed compositionen
dc.subjectFeed conversion ratioen
dc.titleEnvironmental trade-offs of pig production systems under varied operational efficienciesen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3466.pdf
Size:
688.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published Version
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3466-1.pdf
Size:
433.51 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Additional File 1