Intrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a porcine kidney model

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorYap, Lee Chien
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Donnacha
dc.contributor.authorPatterson, Kenneth
dc.contributor.authorMcGuinness, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Charles
dc.contributor.authorSharfi, Ashraf
dc.contributor.authorHennessey, Derek Barry
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-08T11:00:18Z
dc.date.available2022-07-08T11:00:18Z
dc.date.issued44693
dc.description.abstractBackground: Increased intrarenal pressure during endoscopic lithotripsy is associated with increased adverse outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of various devices on IRP during percutaneous intrarenal surgery in ex vivo porcine kidney models. Methods: Whole intact porcine urinary tracts were harvested. Intrarenal pressure was measured using cystometrometry software. Intrarenal pressure during PCNL was recorded using variations of percutaneous access sheath size, irrigation height of 100 cm and 60 cm, use of a ureteric catheter and use of suction. The primary outcome was absolute IRP measurements. Secondary outcomes were comparisons of IRP between techniques. Results: Using a 30 Fr vs 26 Fr access sheath and 26 Fr nephroscope the mean pressure at an irrigation height of 60 cm was significantly lower than 100 cm (p = 0.0013 vs p < 0.0001, respectively). Pressure’s during mini-PCNL were significantly higher than conventional PCNL in all variations. Using the 16.5 Fr access sheath and 12 Fr nephroscope produced a significantly lower pressure at a 60 cm irrigation height than 100 cm (p = 0.0010). IRP was significantly lower with a ureteric catheter in place vs no ureteric catheter at 100 cm (p = 0.0015) and at 60 cm (p = 0.0040). Conclusions: Using standard PCNL tract sizes intrarenal pressure varied significantly depending on the height of the irrigation fluid. Mini-PCNL is at higher risk of pathological pressure, however, the use of a ureteric catheter significantly decreased pressure. To maintain safe IRP during PCNL urologists should be aware of these significant variations.en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionAccepted Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.citationYap, L. C., Hogan, D., Patterson, K., McGuinness, G., O’Connor, C., Sharfi, A. and Hennessey, D. B. (2022) 'Intrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a porcine kidney model', Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 56(3), pp. 251-254. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2073387en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/21681805.2022.2073387en
dc.identifier.eissn2168-1813
dc.identifier.endpage254en
dc.identifier.issn2168-1805
dc.identifier.issued3en
dc.identifier.journaltitleScandinavian Journal of Urologyen
dc.identifier.startpage251en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/13354
dc.identifier.volume56en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.rights© 2022, Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica Society. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an item published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Urology on 12 May 2022, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2073387. It is deposited under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en
dc.subjectPCNLen
dc.subjectIntrarenal pressureen
dc.subjectAccess sheathen
dc.titleIntrarenal pressures during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a porcine kidney modelen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
ISJU Pre-Print Proof (tracked).pdf
Size:
231.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Accepted Version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Medicine - Journal Articles