Enhancing the clinical pharmacy service of a large teaching hospital: Development of a new clinical prioritisation tool

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2023-09-21
Authors
Clarke, Rebecca
Colleran, Maeve
Melanophy, Gail
Bermingham, Margaret
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Background: The number and complexity of patients being admitted to hospitals is rising and some patients may not receive a full clinical pharmacy review or be reviewed as regularly as needed during their inpatient stay. This is a risk factor for medication errors. Clinical prioritisation identifies patients who are high-risk and most in need of a pharmacist review, targeting finite pharmacy resources to patients who will benefit the most. Objectives: Assess and enhance clinical prioritisation within a hospital pharmacy department. Methods: The study was conducted in a large urban academic teaching hospital. A cross-sectional survey of clinical pharmacists in the hospital was conducted to establish the patient clinical criteria they prioritise in their work. A clinical prioritisation tool was developed based on survey findings and was integrated into an existing electronic pharmacy care interface. A pre- and post-intervention study was conducted, consisting of data collection for five days pre- and five days post-implementation of the tool. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis. Results: Of 39 eligible pharmacists, 37 (95%) responded to the survey. The top-rated prioritisation criteria, including medicines reconciliation tasks and high-risk medicines, helped to inform the content of the clinical prioritisation tool. Post-intervention, there were more Level 1 complex patients reviewed by pharmacists and fewer Level 3 stable patients compared to pre-intervention. Tool sensitivity ranged from 51 to 88%, depending on the experience of the pharmacist using the tool. High levels of satisfaction with clinical prioritisation were reported by those using the tool. Conclusion: This newly developed clinical prioritisation tool has the potential to support pharmacists in identifying and reviewing patients in a more targeted manner than practice prior to tool development. Continued development and validation of the tool is essential, with a focus on developing a fully automated tool.
Description
Keywords
Pharmacy , Pharmacy service , Hospital , Clinical pharmacy information systems , Pharmacists
Citation
Clarke, R., Colleran, M., Melanophy, G. and Bermingham, M. (2023) ‘Enhancing the clinical pharmacy service of a large teaching hospital: Development of a new clinical prioritisation tool’, Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy, 12, 100335 (8 pp). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100335
Link to publisher’s version