Predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among community-dwelling older adults assessed for support services
dc.check.date | 2021-06-18 | |
dc.check.info | Access to this article is restricted until 6 months after publication by request of the publisher. | en |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, Gary | |
dc.contributor.author | Chai, Yi | |
dc.contributor.author | Troya, M. Isabela | |
dc.contributor.author | Luo, Hao | |
dc.contributor.funder | University of Auckland | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-22T10:40:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-22T10:40:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-18 | |
dc.date.updated | 2021-01-22T10:10:35Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Older adults receiving support services are a population at risk for self-harm due to physical illness and functional impairment, which are known risk factors. This study aims to investigate the relative importance of predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among older adults assessed for support services in New Zealand. Methods: interRAI-Home Care (HC) national data of older adults (aged ≥ 60) were linked to mortality and hospital discharge data between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016. We calculated the crude incidence of self-harm per 100,000 person-years, and gender and age-adjusted standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). The Fine and Gray competing risk regression model was fitted to estimate the hazard ratio (HR; 95% CIs) of self-harm associated with various demographic, psychosocial, clinical factors, and summary scales. Results: A total of 93,501 older adults were included. At the end of the follow-up period, 251 (0.27%) people had at least one episode of nonfatal self-harm and 36,333 (38.86%) people died. The overall incidence of nonfatal self-harm was 160.39 (95% CI, 141.36–181.06) per 100,000 person-years and SIR was 5.12 (95% CI, 4.51–5.78), with the highest incidence in the first year of follow-up. Depression diagnosis (HR, 3.02, 2.26–4.03), at-risk alcohol use (2.38, 1.30–4.35), and bipolar disorder (2.18, 1.25–3.80) were the most significant risk factors. Protective effects were found with cancer (0.57, 0.36–0.89) and severe level of functional impairment measured by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Hierarchy Scale (0.56, 0.35–0.89). Conclusion: Psychiatric factors are the most significant predictors for nonfatal self-harm among older adults receiving support services. Our results can be used to inform healthcare professionals for timely identification of people at high risk of self-harm and the development of more efficient and targeted prevention strategies, with specific attention to individuals with depression or depressive symptoms, particularly in the first year of follow-up. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Auckland (Sir John Logan Campbell Medical Fellowship) | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Accepted Version | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Cheung, G., Chai, Y., Troya, M. I. and Luo, H. (2020) 'Predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among community-dwelling older adults assessed for support services', International Psychogeriatrics. doi: 10.1017/S1041610220003853 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S1041610220003853 | en |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1741-203X | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 14 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1041-6102 | |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | International Psychogeriatrics | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/10947 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | en |
dc.rights | © 2020, International Psychogeriatric Association. Published by Cambridge University Press. This material is free to view and download for personal use only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. | en |
dc.subject | Suicide | en |
dc.subject | Depression | en |
dc.subject | Older people | en |
dc.subject | Older adults | en |
dc.subject | interRAI | en |
dc.title | Predictive factors of nonfatal self-harm among community-dwelling older adults assessed for support services | en |
dc.type | Article (peer-reviewed) | en |