Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGargon, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorGorst, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorHarman, Nicola L.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorMatvienko-Sikar, Karen
dc.contributor.authorWilliamson, Paula R.
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen
dc.contributor.funderMedical Research Councilen
dc.contributor.funderHealth Research Boarden
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T12:10:44Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T12:10:44Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-28
dc.description.abstractThe Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) database is a publically available, searchable repository of published and ongoing core outcome set (COS) studies. An annual systematic review update is carried out to maintain the currency of database content.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR Senior Investigator Award (NF-SI_0513-10025); Health Research Board Interdisciplinary Capacity Enhancement Award (2015-1026)en
dc.description.statusPeer revieweden
dc.description.versionPublished Versionen
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.articleide0209869en
dc.identifier.citationGargon, E., Gorst, S.L., Harman, N.L., Smith, V., Matvienko-Sikar, K. and Williamson, P.R., 2018. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research. PloS one, e0209869, (15pp.). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209869en
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0209869en
dc.identifier.endpage15en
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.issued12en
dc.identifier.journaltitlePLoS ONEen
dc.identifier.startpage1en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10468/7922
dc.identifier.volume13en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPLoS ONEen
dc.relation.projectinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/RCUK/MRC/MR/K025635/1/GB/MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research/en
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0209869
dc.rights© 2018 Gargon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en
dc.subjectDatabase searchingen
dc.subjectSystematic reviewsen
dc.subjectResearch reporting guidelinesen
dc.subjectComparative effectiveness researchen
dc.subjectDrug research and developmenten
dc.subjectResearch quality assessmenten
dc.subjectHealth services researchen
dc.subjectSocial researchen
dc.titleChoosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for researchen
dc.typeArticle (peer-reviewed)en
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0209869.pdf
Size:
1.22 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Published version
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Public Health - Journal Articles
Nursing and Midwifery - Journal Articles