Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?
dc.contributor.author | Savage, James L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Browning, Lucy E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Manica, Andrea | |
dc.contributor.author | Russell, Andrew F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johnstone, Rufus A. | |
dc.contributor.funder | Natural Environment Research Council | en |
dc.contributor.funder | Irish Research Council | en |
dc.contributor.funder | Australian Research Council | en |
dc.contributor.funder | Royal Society | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-11-09T13:02:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-11-09T13:02:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-09-17 | |
dc.description.abstract | For individuals collaborating to rear offspring, effective organization of resource delivery is difficult because each carer benefits when the others provide a greater share of the total investment required. When investment is provided in discrete events, one possible solution is to adopt a turn-taking strategy whereby each individual reduces its contribution rate after investing, only increasing its rate again once another carer contributes. To test whether turn-taking occurs in a natural cooperative care system, here we use a continuous time Markov model to deduce the provisioning behavior of the chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a cooperatively breeding Australian bird with variable number of carers. Our analysis suggests that turn-taking occurs across a range of group sizes (2–6), with individual birds being more likely to visit following other individuals than to make repeat visits. We show using a randomization test that some of this apparent turn-taking arises as a by-product of the distribution of individual inter-visit intervals (“passive” turn-taking) but that individuals also respond actively to the investment of others over and above this effect (“active” turn-taking). We conclude that turn-taking in babblers is a consequence of both their individual provisioning behavior and deliberate response rules, with the former effect arising through a minimum interval required to forage and travel to and from the nest. Our results reinforce the importance of considering fine-scale investment dynamics when studying parental care and suggest that behavioral rules such as turn-taking may be more common than previously thought. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | Natural Environment Research Council (studentship; New Investigators NE/D000394/1); Irish Research Council (Government of Ireland postdoctoral fellowship); Australian Research Council (DP1094295); Royal Society (University Fellowship Scheme) | en |
dc.description.status | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.description.version | Draft | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Savage, J. L., Browning, L. E., Manica, A., Russell, A. F. and Johnstone, R. A. (2017) 'Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?', Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71(11), 162 (10pp). doi: 10.1007/s00265-017-2391-4 | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00265-017-2391-4 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 162-10 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-0762 | |
dc.identifier.issued | 11 | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology | en |
dc.identifier.startpage | 162-1 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10468/5002 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 71 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Springer Verlag | en |
dc.rights | © The Authors 2017. This article is an open access publication. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. | en |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en |
dc.subject | Cooperative breeding | en |
dc.subject | Parental care | en |
dc.subject | Provisioning rules | en |
dc.subject | Reciprocity | en |
dc.title | Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule? | en |
dc.type | Article (peer-reviewed) | en |